Seek Returns logo

FI vs. LDOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FI and LDOS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFILDOS
Company NameFiserv, Inc.Leidos Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization73.00 billion USD23.34 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 25, 1986October 17, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FI and LDOS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FI vs. LDOS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFILDOS
5-Day Price Return1.20%3.81%
13-Week Price Return-28.12%16.57%
26-Week Price Return-41.93%29.21%
52-Week Price Return-16.64%25.75%
Month-to-Date Return-3.35%13.97%
Year-to-Date Return-34.63%26.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.82M1.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.47M1.22M
3-Month Volatility47.73%25.00%
Beta0.980.72

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FI

12.76%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FI’s Return on Equity of 12.76% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LDOS

31.25%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s Return on Equity of 31.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

16.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

FI’s Net Profit Margin of 16.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LDOS

8.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

LDOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

29.43%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FI’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.43% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LDOS

11.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

LDOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.95% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFILDOS
Return on Equity (TTM)12.76%31.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.24%10.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%8.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.43%11.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.14%17.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.09

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

LDOS

1.62

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

LDOS’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

LDOS

1.09

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

LDOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.09 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FI

4.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

LDOS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

LDOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFILDOS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.091.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.931.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.171.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.5611.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

FI vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FI vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LDOS

0.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Yield of 0.91% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LDOS

14.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.91% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFILDOS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FI

21.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

FI’s P/E Ratio of 21.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LDOS

16.42

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s P/E Ratio of 16.42 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FI

3.46

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

LDOS

1.35

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

LDOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FI

3.79

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FI’s P/B Ratio of 3.79 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LDOS

4.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

LDOS’s P/B Ratio of 4.54 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FI vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFILDOS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.6116.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.461.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.794.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.1617.19