Seek Returns logo

FI vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FI and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFIIBM
Company NameFiserv, Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesIT Services
Market Capitalization73.00 billion USD223.63 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 25, 1986January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FI and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FI vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFIIBM
5-Day Price Return1.20%-4.03%
13-Week Price Return-28.12%-5.37%
26-Week Price Return-41.93%-5.28%
52-Week Price Return-16.64%26.70%
Month-to-Date Return-3.35%-5.17%
Year-to-Date Return-34.63%9.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.82M6.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.47M4.78M
3-Month Volatility47.73%25.75%
Beta0.980.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FI

12.76%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FI’s Return on Equity of 12.76% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

16.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

FI’s Net Profit Margin of 16.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

29.43%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FI’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.43% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFIIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)12.76%21.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.24%4.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%9.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.43%9.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.14%57.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.09

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FI

4.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFIIBM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.090.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.930.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.172.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.5645.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

FI vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FI vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBM

2.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.77%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFIIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%75.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FI

21.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

FI’s P/E Ratio of 21.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM

38.31

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

A P/E Ratio of 38.31 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FI

3.46

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

IBM

3.49

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 3.49 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FI

3.79

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FI’s P/B Ratio of 3.79 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FI vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFIIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.6138.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.463.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.799.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.1619.01