Seek Returns logo

FI vs. GRMN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FI and GRMN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFIGRMN
Company NameFiserv, Inc.Garmin Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesSwitzerland
GICS SectorFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization73.00 billion USD45.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 25, 1986December 8, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FI and GRMN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FI vs. GRMN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFIGRMN
5-Day Price Return1.20%3.33%
13-Week Price Return-28.12%19.50%
26-Week Price Return-41.93%7.64%
52-Week Price Return-16.64%40.35%
Month-to-Date Return-3.35%8.15%
Year-to-Date Return-34.63%14.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.82M0.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.47M0.92M
3-Month Volatility47.73%25.11%
Beta0.981.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FI

12.76%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FI’s Return on Equity of 12.76% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

16.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

FI’s Net Profit Margin of 16.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

29.43%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FI’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.43% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFIGRMN
Return on Equity (TTM)12.76%19.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.24%16.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%23.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.43%26.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.14%58.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.09

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FI

4.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFIGRMN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.093.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.931.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.170.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.5673.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

FI vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FI vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GRMN

1.35%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.35% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFIGRMN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%38.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FI

21.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

FI’s P/E Ratio of 21.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRMN

28.70

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 28.70 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FI

3.46

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

GRMN

6.66

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 6.66, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FI

3.79

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FI’s P/B Ratio of 3.79 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FI vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFIGRMN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.6128.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.466.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.794.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.1639.95