Seek Returns logo

FI vs. GRAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FI and GRAB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFIGRAB
Company NameFiserv, Inc.Grab Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization73.00 billion USD20.87 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 25, 1986December 1, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FI and GRAB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FI vs. GRAB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFIGRAB
5-Day Price Return1.20%3.43%
13-Week Price Return-28.12%2.61%
26-Week Price Return-41.93%9.64%
52-Week Price Return-16.64%57.06%
Month-to-Date Return-3.35%4.70%
Year-to-Date Return-34.63%8.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.82M35.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.47M37.98M
3-Month Volatility47.73%40.83%
Beta0.980.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FI

12.76%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FI’s Return on Equity of 12.76% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

16.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

FI’s Net Profit Margin of 16.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

29.43%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FI’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.43% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFIGRAB
Return on Equity (TTM)12.76%1.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.24%1.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%3.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.43%-1.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.14%42.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.09

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FI

4.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFIGRAB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.091.88
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.931.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.170.30
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.56-3.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

FI vs. GRAB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FI vs. GRAB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFIGRAB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FI

21.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

FI’s P/E Ratio of 21.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRAB

188.01

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

At 188.01, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FI

3.46

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

GRAB

6.79

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 6.79, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FI

3.79

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FI’s P/B Ratio of 3.79 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FI vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFIGRAB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.61188.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.466.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.793.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.1634.27