Seek Returns logo

FI vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FI and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FI is a standard domestic listing, while GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFIGDS
Company NameFiserv, Inc.GDS Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesIT Services
Market Capitalization73.00 billion USD6.88 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateSeptember 25, 1986November 2, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FI and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FI vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFIGDS
5-Day Price Return1.20%-1.84%
13-Week Price Return-28.12%29.01%
26-Week Price Return-41.93%42.30%
52-Week Price Return-16.64%-19.97%
Month-to-Date Return-3.35%-0.79%
Year-to-Date Return-34.63%54.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.82M6.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.47M8.73M
3-Month Volatility47.73%60.94%
Beta0.981.56

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FI

12.76%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FI’s Return on Equity of 12.76% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GDS

19.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

16.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

FI’s Net Profit Margin of 16.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GDS

41.75%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 41.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

29.43%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FI’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.43% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS

21.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.69% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFIGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)12.76%19.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.24%5.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%41.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.43%21.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.14%21.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.09

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GDS

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

GDS

1.75

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.75. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FI

4.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFIGDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.091.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.931.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.171.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.560.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

FI vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FI vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFIGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FI

21.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

FI’s P/E Ratio of 21.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GDS

11.54

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 11.54 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FI

3.46

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

GDS

4.82

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.82 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FI

3.79

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FI’s P/B Ratio of 3.79 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS

1.40

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FI vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFIGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.6111.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.464.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.791.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.16--