FHN vs. MA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FHN and MA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FHN	MA
Company Name	First Horizon Corporation	Mastercard Incorporated
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	11.26 billion USD	522.43 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	May 25, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FHN and MA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FHN vs. MA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FHN	MA
5-Day Price Return	4.82%	2.97%
13-Week Price Return	10.57%	-0.06%
26-Week Price Return	-0.94%	1.89%
52-Week Price Return	47.57%	26.82%
Month-to-Date Return	1.70%	2.02%
Year-to-Date Return	10.13%	9.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume	9.59M	2.89M
3-Month Avg. Volume	6.69M	2.85M
3-Month Volatility	24.36%	21.86%
Beta	0.71	0.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FHN

9.49%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

FHN’s Return on Equity of 9.49% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MA

191.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

MA’s Return on Equity of 191.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FHN

28.06%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

FHN’s Net Profit Margin of 28.06% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MA

44.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 44.93% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FHN

36.18%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

FHN’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.18% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MA

55.78%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 55.78% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FHN	MA
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.49%	191.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.03%	27.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	28.06%	44.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	36.18%	55.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FHN

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MA

1.16

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FHN

0.54

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

MA

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FHN

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

MA

37.93

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FHN	MA
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.54	2.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	37.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

FHN vs. MA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FHN vs. MA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FHN

3.12%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

FHN’s Dividend Yield of 3.12% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MA

0.50%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MA’s Dividend Yield of 0.50% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FHN

41.40%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

FHN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 41.40% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MA

19.15%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.15% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FHN	MA
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.12%	0.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	41.40%	19.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FHN

13.25

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

A P/E Ratio of 13.25 places FHN in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MA

38.51

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

A P/E Ratio of 38.51 places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FHN

1.91

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

MA

17.30

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FHN

1.20

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

FHN’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MA

64.98

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

At 64.98, MA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FHN vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FHN	MA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	13.25	38.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.91	17.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	64.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	11.50	32.97