FG vs. PUK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FG and PUK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FG is a standard domestic listing, while PUK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	FG	PUK
Company Name	F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.	Prudential plc
Country	United States	Hong Kong
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Insurance	Insurance
Market Capitalization	4.77 billion USD	34.24 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 22, 2022	June 29, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FG and PUK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FG vs. PUK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FG	PUK
5-Day Price Return	3.90%	1.44%
13-Week Price Return	12.76%	13.41%
26-Week Price Return	-19.64%	48.30%
52-Week Price Return	-5.94%	50.34%
Month-to-Date Return	11.06%	2.14%
Year-to-Date Return	-14.48%	54.54%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.21M	3.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.25M	4.44M
3-Month Volatility	29.62%	18.04%
Beta	1.67	1.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FG

16.12%

Insurance Industry

Max: 29.03%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 13.90%
Q1: 10.42%
Min: -0.64%

FG’s Return on Equity of 16.12% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PUK

13.58%

Insurance Industry

Max: 29.03%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 13.90%
Q1: 10.42%
Min: -0.64%

PUK’s Return on Equity of 13.58% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FG

12.43%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.06%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 5.48%
Min: -7.05%

FG’s Net Profit Margin of 12.43% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PUK

19.26%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.06%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 5.48%
Min: -7.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.26% places PUK in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FG

18.70%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.49%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

PUK

20.87%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.49%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FG	PUK
Return on Equity (TTM)	16.12%	13.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.77%	1.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	12.43%	19.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	18.70%	20.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FG

0.38

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PUK

0.36

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FG

0.50

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

PUK

0.27

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FG

6.89

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 20.84
Median: 9.56
Q1: 3.34
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

PUK

8.97

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 20.84
Median: 9.56
Q1: 3.34
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FG	PUK
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.38	0.36
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.00	0.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.50	0.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.89	8.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

FG vs. PUK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FG vs. PUK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FG

2.62%

Insurance Industry

Max: 8.23%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 3.42%
Q1: 1.97%
Min: 0.00%

FG’s Dividend Yield of 2.62% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PUK

1.63%

Insurance Industry

Max: 8.23%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 3.42%
Q1: 1.97%
Min: 0.00%

PUK’s Dividend Yield of 1.63% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FG

13.95%

Insurance Industry

Max: 168.02%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.71%
Q1: 22.04%
Min: 0.00%

FG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.95% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PUK

24.16%

Insurance Industry

Max: 168.02%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.71%
Q1: 22.04%
Min: 0.00%

PUK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.16% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FG	PUK
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.62%	1.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	13.95%	24.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FG

7.09

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.91
Q3: 17.76
Median: 13.63
Q1: 10.02
Min: 2.89

In the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, FG’s P/E Ratio of 7.09 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PUK

14.84

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.91
Q3: 17.76
Median: 13.63
Q1: 10.02
Min: 2.89

PUK’s P/E Ratio of 14.84 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FG

0.88

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.23

FG’s P/S Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PUK

2.86

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.23

PUK’s P/S Ratio of 2.86 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FG

0.97

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.48
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.19

FG’s P/B Ratio of 0.97 is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PUK

1.31

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.48
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.19

PUK’s P/B Ratio of 1.31 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FG	PUK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	7.09	14.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.88	2.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.97	1.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	0.88	9.67