Seek Returns logo

FFIV vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FFIV and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFFIVJBL
Company NameF5, Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization18.90 billion USD21.70 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 4, 1999May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FFIV and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FFIV vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFFIVJBL
5-Day Price Return1.80%-6.89%
13-Week Price Return9.94%-10.30%
26-Week Price Return22.50%48.22%
52-Week Price Return50.86%68.64%
Month-to-Date Return1.80%-6.89%
Year-to-Date Return30.83%40.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.34M1.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.46M1.56M
3-Month Volatility23.37%34.99%
Beta1.021.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FFIV

20.29%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

FFIV’s Return on Equity of 20.29% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JBL

45.71%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 45.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FFIV

22.06%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.06% places FFIV in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL

2.20%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FFIV

24.84%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.84% places FFIV in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL

3.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.97% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFFIVJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)20.29%45.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.34%3.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.06%2.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.84%3.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)81.03%8.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FFIV

1.60

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

FFIV’s Current Ratio of 1.60 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

JBL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FFIV

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, FFIV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JBL

1.91

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

55.49

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

FFIV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.49 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

JBL

4.08

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFFIVJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.601.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.500.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)55.494.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

FFIV vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FFIV vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FFIV

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FFIV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FFIV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

5.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFFIVJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%5.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

27.98

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

FFIV’s P/E Ratio of 27.98 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL

33.67

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 33.67 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

6.17

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

FFIV’s P/S Ratio of 6.17 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL

0.74

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.74 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FFIV

4.87

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

FFIV’s P/B Ratio of 4.87 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL

14.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 14.53, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FFIV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFFIVJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.9833.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.170.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.8714.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.5518.88