Seek Returns logo

FFIV vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FFIV and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFFIVIBM
Company NameF5, Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentIT Services
Market Capitalization18.72 billion USD223.63 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 4, 1999January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FFIV and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FFIV vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFFIVIBM
5-Day Price Return2.70%-4.03%
13-Week Price Return16.21%-5.37%
26-Week Price Return5.97%-5.28%
52-Week Price Return72.20%26.70%
Month-to-Date Return3.95%-5.17%
Year-to-Date Return29.55%9.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.73M6.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.52M4.78M
3-Month Volatility22.66%25.75%
Beta1.080.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FFIV

20.29%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

In the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, FFIV’s Return on Equity of 20.29% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FFIV

22.06%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.06% places FFIV in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FFIV

24.84%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.84% places FFIV in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFFIVIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)20.29%21.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.34%4.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.06%9.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.84%9.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)81.03%57.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FFIV

1.60

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

FFIV’s Current Ratio of 1.60 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FFIV

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, FFIV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

55.49

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

FFIV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFFIVIBM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.600.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.500.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)55.4945.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

FFIV vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FFIV vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FFIV

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FFIV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBM

2.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.77%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FFIV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFFIVIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%75.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

28.17

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

FFIV’s P/E Ratio of 28.17 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM

38.31

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

A P/E Ratio of 38.31 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FFIV

6.21

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

FFIV’s P/S Ratio of 6.21 is in the upper echelon for the Communications Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IBM

3.49

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 3.49 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FFIV

4.87

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

FFIV’s P/B Ratio of 4.87 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FFIV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFFIVIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.1738.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.213.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.879.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.6819.01