Seek Returns logo

FERG vs. ULS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FERG and ULS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFERGULS
Company NameFerguson Enterprises Inc.UL Solutions Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization46.00 billion USD14.83 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 5, 2010April 12, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FERG and ULS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FERG vs. ULS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFERGULS
5-Day Price Return4.41%4.16%
13-Week Price Return5.07%0.99%
26-Week Price Return45.87%27.59%
52-Week Price Return22.32%48.03%
Month-to-Date Return4.41%4.16%
Year-to-Date Return35.10%47.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.75M0.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.71M0.79M
3-Month Volatility29.09%35.48%
Beta1.130.44

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FERG

32.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.66%
Median
13.72%
Q1
9.74%
Min
-0.34%

In the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, FERG’s Return on Equity of 32.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ULS

34.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

ULS’s Return on Equity of 34.07% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FERG

6.03%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
16.11%
Q3
9.48%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.68%
Min
-1.09%

FERG’s Net Profit Margin of 6.03% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ULS

11.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

ULS’s Net Profit Margin of 11.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FERG

8.47%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
26.26%
Q3
14.59%
Median
7.05%
Q1
4.94%
Min
-8.06%

FERG’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.47% is around the midpoint for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ULS

16.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

ULS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.71% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFERGULS
Return on Equity (TTM)32.99%34.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.86%11.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.03%11.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.47%16.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.67%48.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FERG

1.68

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.27
Median
1.60
Q1
1.41
Min
0.26

FERG’s Current Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the median group of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ULS

1.32

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ULS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FERG

0.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.24
Median
0.79
Q1
0.61
Min
0.01

FERG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ULS

0.56

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

ULS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FERG

13.75

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.67
Q1
2.04
Min
-1.67

FERG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.75 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ULS

11.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

ULS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFERGULS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.681.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.781.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.640.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.7511.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

FERG vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FERG vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FERG

1.06%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.25%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.06%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

FERG’s Dividend Yield of 1.06% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ULS

0.69%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Yield of 0.69% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FERG

35.28%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
71.34%
Median
47.49%
Q1
22.56%
Min
0.00%

FERG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.28% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ULS

31.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.19% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFERGULS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.06%0.69%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.28%31.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FERG

24.74

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
42.69
Q3
25.21
Median
16.99
Q1
13.13
Min
5.35

FERG’s P/E Ratio of 24.74 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ULS

45.34

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 45.34 places ULS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FERG

1.49

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.71
Median
1.06
Q1
0.70
Min
0.30

FERG’s P/S Ratio of 1.49 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ULS

5.02

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

ULS’s P/S Ratio of 5.02 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FERG

7.55

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.63
Median
2.09
Q1
1.30
Min
0.31

FERG’s P/B Ratio of 7.55 is in the upper tier for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ULS

13.37

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

ULS’s P/B Ratio of 13.37 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FERG vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFERGULS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.7445.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.495.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.5513.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)28.6540.73