Seek Returns logo

FERG vs. FLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FERG and FLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFERGFLR
Company NameFerguson Enterprises Inc.Fluor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization46.13 billion USD6.89 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 5, 2010December 1, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FERG and FLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FERG vs. FLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFERGFLR
5-Day Price Return2.27%-3.35%
13-Week Price Return30.15%13.64%
26-Week Price Return26.10%-12.60%
52-Week Price Return17.38%-11.37%
Month-to-Date Return2.92%-24.87%
Year-to-Date Return32.43%-13.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.02M7.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.61M3.93M
3-Month Volatility38.72%71.66%
Beta1.111.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FERG

28.84%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

In the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, FERG’s Return on Equity of 28.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FERG

5.32%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

FERG’s Net Profit Margin of 5.32% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FERG

8.25%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

FERG’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.25% is around the midpoint for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFERGFLR
Return on Equity (TTM)28.84%105.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.56%45.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.32%25.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.25%1.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.46%3.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FERG

1.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

FERG’s Current Ratio of 1.64 aligns with the median group of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FERG

0.74

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

FERG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FERG

14.77

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

FERG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.77 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFERGFLR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.641.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.721.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.740.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.77--

Growth

Revenue Growth

FERG vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FERG vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FERG

1.43%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FERG’s Dividend Yield of 1.43% is consistent with its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FERG

56.55%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

FERG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.55% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLR

10.51%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FLR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.51% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFERGFLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.43%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)56.55%10.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FERG

28.04

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

A P/E Ratio of 28.04 places FERG in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FLR

1.68

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.68 is below the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FERG

1.49

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

FERG’s P/S Ratio of 1.49 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLR

0.43

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FERG

6.10

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

FERG’s P/B Ratio of 6.10 is in the upper tier for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FERG vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFERGFLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.041.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.490.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.101.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.447.36