FER vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FER and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FER	VRSK
Company Name	Ferrovial SE	Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Country	Netherlands	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Professional Services
Market Capitalization	39.01 billion USD	36.91 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	August 13, 2012	October 7, 2009
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FER and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FER vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FER	VRSK
5-Day Price Return	1.61%	-0.12%
13-Week Price Return	4.65%	-13.00%
26-Week Price Return	11.20%	-10.43%
52-Week Price Return	23.92%	0.70%
Month-to-Date Return	1.29%	-5.21%
Year-to-Date Return	12.02%	-4.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.53M	1.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.69M	0.96M
3-Month Volatility	14.08%	21.49%
Beta	0.89	0.87

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 29.61%
Q3: 17.18%
Median: 10.42%
Q1: 8.10%
Min: -0.10%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 52.17%
Q3: 30.06%
Median: 22.21%
Q1: 11.67%
Min: -13.44%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.14%
Q3: 6.17%
Median: 3.85%
Q1: 2.40%
Min: -0.05%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 26.06%
Q3: 13.34%
Median: 7.88%
Q1: 3.50%
Min: -2.93%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.56%
Q3: 9.36%
Median: 5.46%
Q1: 3.47%
Min: -1.93%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 35.84%
Q3: 19.38%
Median: 12.54%
Q1: 7.36%
Min: -5.21%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FER	VRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)	56.21%	439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)	12.11%	19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	35.99%	30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	34.91%	43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	87.83%	69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 1.98
Q3: 1.53
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.66

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.45
Q3: 1.65
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.63
Q3: 1.44
Median: 0.91
Q1: 0.49
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 23.59
Q3: 14.49
Median: 8.20
Q1: 5.26
Min: -6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max: 39.67
Q3: 20.05
Median: 11.07
Q1: 5.36
Min: -2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FER	VRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.94	1.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.86	1.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.95	10.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	9.20	43.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

FER vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FER vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FER

0.37%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 2.02%
Q1: 0.23%
Min: 0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.37% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRSK

0.64%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 5.28%
Q3: 2.51%
Median: 1.63%
Q1: 0.62%
Min: 0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 69.47%
Median: 40.99%
Q1: 10.51%
Min: 0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 109.23%
Q3: 64.39%
Median: 47.00%
Q1: 20.35%
Min: 0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FER	VRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.37%	0.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	3.63%	25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FER

9.68

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.96
Q3: 24.81
Median: 15.45
Q1: 12.51
Min: 2.74

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 9.68 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VRSK

40.42

Professional Services Industry

Max: 49.59
Q3: 36.59
Median: 28.13
Q1: 18.55
Min: 10.07

A P/E Ratio of 40.42 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.48

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 3.22
Q3: 1.63
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.48, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VRSK

12.40

Professional Services Industry

Max: 9.54
Q3: 5.11
Median: 2.10
Q1: 0.75
Min: 0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 12.40, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.74
Q3: 3.33
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.23

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max: 13.75
Q3: 8.87
Median: 4.35
Q1: 2.43
Min: 0.54

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FER vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FER	VRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	9.68	40.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.48	12.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.63	139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	28.40	36.29