Seek Returns

FER vs. TXT: Ferrovial vs. Textron Stock Comparison

How do Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FER is classified in Construction & Engineering while TXT is classified in Aerospace & Defense.

Company profile comparison for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT)
Profile ItemFERTXT
NameFerrovial N.V.Textron Inc.
Country/RegionNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAerospace & Defense
GICS Sub-IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization42.19 billion USD14.15 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateAugust 13, 2012February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FER
TXT
GSPC
Loading price history…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT)
MetricFERTXT
Total Return (1Y)-1.10%3.94%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)26.01%4.49%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)17.20%2.30%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FER
TXT
GSPC
Loading price history…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT)
MetricFERTXT
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)27.38%29.18%
Beta (5Y)0.360.87
Max Drawdown (5Y)-33.67%-37.33%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.95M1.72M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FER and TXT are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT)
MetricFERTXT
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.20-0.01
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.30-0.02

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% and Textron (TXT) at 12.48% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

11.62%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FER
11.62%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

TXT

Capital Goods industry group

12.48%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
TXT
12.48%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15% and Textron (TXT) at 6.30% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.15%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
FER
6.15%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

TXT

Capital Goods industry group

6.30%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
TXT
6.30%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% and Textron (TXT) at 9.33% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

10.45%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
FER
10.45%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

TXT

Capital Goods industry group

9.33%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
TXT
9.33%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT)
MetricFERTXT
ROE (TTM)11.62%12.48%
ROA (TTM)2.62%4.51%
Net Margin (TTM)6.15%6.30%
Operating Margin (TTM)10.45%9.33%
Gross Margin (TTM)87.14%17.53%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% and Textron (TXT) at 8.01% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Textron (TXT) at 18.02% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT)
MetricFERTXT
Revenue Growth (YoY)5.24%8.01%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)8.43%4.77%
EPS Growth (YoY)-72.26%18.02%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)70.54%8.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Textron (TXT) at 1.80 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FER.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.20

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
FER
1.20
Min
0.36

TXT

Capital Goods industry group

1.80

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
TXT
1.80
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Textron (TXT) at 0.52 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 uses more debt funding than most peers.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.44

Max
2.33
FER
1.44
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

TXT

Capital Goods industry group

0.52

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
TXT
0.52
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT)
MetricFERTXT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.201.80
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.440.52
Net Debt / EBITDA4.391.54

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 0.94% and Textron (TXT) at 0.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

0.94%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FER
0.94%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TXT

Capital Goods industry group

0.09%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
TXT
0.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Textron (TXT) at 1.44% keeps its payout in the industry’s typical band, while Ferrovial (FER) at 71.24% pays out more than any of its peers — the most stretched cover in its group.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

71.24%

FER
71.24%
Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TXT

Capital Goods industry group

1.44%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
TXT
1.44%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT)
MetricFERTXT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.94%0.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)71.24%1.44%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Textron (TXT) at 15.03 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for TXT, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

32.26

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
FER
32.26
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

TXT

Capital Goods industry group

15.03

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
TXT
15.03
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Textron (TXT) at 0.92 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

4.28

Max
7.54
FER
4.28
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

TXT

Capital Goods industry group

0.92

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
TXT
0.92
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Textron (TXT) at 1.74 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.59

Max
9.66
FER
6.59
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

TXT

Capital Goods industry group

1.74

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
TXT
1.74
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Textron (TXT): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Textron (TXT)
MetricFERTXT
P/E Ratio (TTM)32.2615.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)4.280.92
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.591.74
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.11%5.35%