Seek Returns logo

FER vs. TDG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FER and TDG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFERTDG
Company NameFerrovial SETransDigm Group Incorporated
CountryNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization43.71 billion USD72.46 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 13, 2012March 15, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FER and TDG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FER vs. TDG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFERTDG
5-Day Price Return4.90%0.16%
13-Week Price Return14.60%-15.76%
26-Week Price Return23.82%-5.69%
52-Week Price Return37.35%-5.21%
Month-to-Date Return5.70%-2.44%
Year-to-Date Return27.00%1.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.72M0.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.59M0.31M
3-Month Volatility14.17%31.98%
Beta0.920.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TDG

37.11%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, TDG’s Return on Equity of 37.11% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

TDG

22.52%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

TDG’s Net Profit Margin of 22.52% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

TDG

45.94%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

TDG’s Operating Profit Margin of 45.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFERTDG
Return on Equity (TTM)56.21%37.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.11%8.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)35.99%22.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)34.91%45.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)87.83%60.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TDG

3.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

TDG’s Current Ratio of 3.13 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TDG

5.41

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.41, TDG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TDG

2.72

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

TDG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFERTDG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.943.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.862.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.955.41
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.202.72

Growth

Revenue Growth

FER vs. TDG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FER vs. TDG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FER

0.33%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.33% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TDG

6.09%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

TDG’s Dividend Yield of 6.09% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TDG

891.68%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

At 891.68%, TDG’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFERTDG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.33%6.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)3.63%891.68%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FER

11.01

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 11.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TDG

37.37

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

TDG’s P/E Ratio of 37.37 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.96, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TDG

8.42

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

TDG’s P/S Ratio of 8.42 is in the upper echelon for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TDG

10.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

TDG’s P/B Ratio of 10.13 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FER vs. TDG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFERTDG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.0137.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.968.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.6310.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.2937.88