Seek Returns

FER vs. SYM: Ferrovial vs. Symbotic Stock Comparison

How do Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FER is classified in Construction & Engineering while SYM is classified in Machinery.

Company profile comparison for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM)
Profile ItemFERSYM
NameFerrovial N.V.Symbotic Inc. Class A Common Stock
Country/RegionNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringMachinery
GICS Sub-IndustryConstruction & EngineeringIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization42.19 billion USD22.29 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNasdaq
Listing DateAugust 13, 2012March 9, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FER
SYM
GSPC
Loading price history…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFERSYM
Total Return (1Y)-1.10%-44.66%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)26.01%6.78%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)17.20%30.90%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FER
SYM
GSPC
Loading price history…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Symbotic (SYM) has a highly aggressive beta of 2.05, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Ferrovial (FER) is defensive at 0.36 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.

Risk profile metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFERSYM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)27.38%78.15%
Beta (5Y)0.362.05
Max Drawdown (5Y)-33.67%-72.46%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.95M1.61M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FER and SYM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFERSYM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.20-0.63
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.30-0.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% and Symbotic (SYM) at 4.39% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

11.62%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FER
11.62%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

4.39%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
SYM
4.39%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Symbotic (SYM) at 0.31% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.15%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
FER
6.15%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

0.31%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
SYM
0.31%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Symbotic (SYM) at 4.59% operates in the bottom quartile.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

10.45%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
FER
10.45%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

4.59%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
SYM
4.59%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFERSYM
ROE (TTM)11.62%4.39%
ROA (TTM)2.62%0.32%
Net Margin (TTM)6.15%0.31%
Operating Margin (TTM)10.45%4.59%
Gross Margin (TTM)87.14%21.27%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Symbotic (SYM) at 25.65% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for SYM.

Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Ferrovial (FER) reports EPS growth of -72.26%, ranked against its industry; Symbotic (SYM) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFERSYM
Revenue Growth (YoY)5.24%25.65%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)8.43%55.87%
EPS Growth (YoY)-72.26%--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)70.54%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 and Symbotic (SYM) at 1.33 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.20

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
FER
1.20
Min
0.36

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

1.33

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
SYM
1.33
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Symbotic (SYM) at 0.02 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.44

Max
2.33
FER
1.44
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

0.02

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
SYM
0.02
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFERSYM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.201.33
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.440.02
Net Debt / EBITDA4.39-30.44

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Symbotic (SYM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a yield of 0.94%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

0.94%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FER
0.94%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
SYM
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Symbotic (SYM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a payout of 71.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

71.24%

FER
71.24%
Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
SYM
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFERSYM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.94%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)71.24%0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Symbotic (SYM) at 460.25 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for SYM’s trailing earnings.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

32.26

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
FER
32.26
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

460.25

SYM
460.25
Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on sales: Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Symbotic (SYM) at 8.42 prices even higher, above its industry range.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

4.28

Max
7.54
FER
4.28
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

8.42

SYM
8.42
Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 and Symbotic (SYM) at 6.70 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.59

Max
9.66
FER
6.59
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

SYM

Capital Goods industry group

6.70

Max
9.66
SYM
6.70
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Symbotic (SYM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Symbotic (SYM)
MetricFERSYM
P/E Ratio (TTM)32.26460.25
P/S Ratio (TTM)4.288.42
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.596.70
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.11%2.46%