Seek Returns logo

FER vs. RSG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FER and RSG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFERRSG
Company NameFerrovial SERepublic Services, Inc.
CountryNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization45.43 billion USD65.66 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 13, 2012July 1, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FER and RSG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FER vs. RSG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFERRSG
5-Day Price Return0.69%2.78%
13-Week Price Return17.56%-9.90%
26-Week Price Return22.33%-11.85%
52-Week Price Return49.81%-2.27%
Month-to-Date Return3.68%0.75%
Year-to-Date Return35.86%4.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.69M1.41M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.68M1.28M
3-Month Volatility16.67%15.60%
Beta0.820.56

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.67%
Median
11.05%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-2.38%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RSG

17.95%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.86%
Q3
17.95%
Median
10.20%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.69%

RSG’s Return on Equity of 17.95% is on par with the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.49%
Median
3.88%
Q1
2.38%
Min
-2.27%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

RSG

12.78%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.54%
Q3
10.35%
Median
5.85%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.78% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.70%
Median
5.84%
Q1
3.94%
Min
-1.78%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

RSG

20.03%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
25.57%
Q3
15.63%
Median
8.06%
Q1
4.76%
Min
-7.48%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.03% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFERRSG
Return on Equity (TTM)56.21%17.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.11%6.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)35.99%12.78%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)34.91%20.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)87.83%42.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.26
Q3
1.54
Median
1.25
Q1
0.99
Min
0.65

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RSG

0.58

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.94
Q3
2.24
Median
1.28
Q1
0.91
Min
0.58

RSG’s Current Ratio of 0.58 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.33
Median
0.64
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RSG

1.12

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.11
Median
0.73
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

RSG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
30.69
Q3
15.27
Median
7.88
Q1
4.27
Min
-6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RSG

4.10

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
24.47
Median
9.83
Q1
3.74
Min
-10.97

RSG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFERRSG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.940.58
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.860.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.951.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.204.10

Growth

Revenue Growth

FER vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FER vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FER

0.31%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.25%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.17%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.31% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RSG

1.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.89%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Yield of 1.12% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
144.77%
Q3
74.39%
Median
50.47%
Q1
8.02%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

RSG

34.43%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
50.54%
Q1
29.39%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.43% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFERRSG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.31%1.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)3.63%34.43%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FER

11.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
39.16
Q3
24.60
Median
17.05
Q1
13.85
Min
1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 11.77 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RSG

30.79

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.06
Q3
35.30
Median
21.86
Q1
16.24
Min
6.18

RSG’s P/E Ratio of 30.79 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FER

4.24

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.52
Median
0.80
Q1
0.48
Min
0.12

With a P/S Ratio of 4.24, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RSG

3.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.55
Q3
3.15
Median
1.07
Q1
0.68
Min
0.06

RSG’s P/S Ratio of 3.94 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
3.97
Median
1.90
Q1
1.22
Min
0.24

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RSG

6.04

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.18
Q3
4.19
Median
2.44
Q1
1.61
Min
0.40

RSG’s P/B Ratio of 6.04 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FER vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFERRSG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.7730.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.243.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.636.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.5425.68