Seek Returns logo

FER vs. ROP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FER and ROP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFERROP
Company NameFerrovial SERoper Technologies, Inc.
CountryNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringSoftware
Market Capitalization40.19 billion USD57.77 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateAugust 13, 2012February 13, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FER and ROP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FER vs. ROP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFERROP
5-Day Price Return1.39%0.86%
13-Week Price Return3.28%-6.28%
26-Week Price Return9.21%-6.23%
52-Week Price Return29.97%-2.65%
Month-to-Date Return5.95%-2.46%
Year-to-Date Return17.17%3.27%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.55M0.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.66M0.59M
3-Month Volatility12.05%15.81%
Beta0.921.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ROP

8.08%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

ROP’s Return on Equity of 8.08% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ROP

20.62%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.62% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ROP

28.06%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.06% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFERROP
Return on Equity (TTM)56.21%8.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.11%4.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)35.99%20.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)34.91%28.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)87.83%68.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ROP

0.46

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ROP’s Current Ratio of 0.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ROP

0.45

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ROP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ROP

80.97

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 80.97, ROP demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFERROP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.940.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.860.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.950.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.2080.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

FER vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FER vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FER

0.36%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.36% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ROP

0.58%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROP’s Dividend Yield of 0.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ROP

21.99%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 21.99%, ROP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFERROP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.36%0.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)3.63%21.99%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FER

10.03

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 10.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ROP

37.65

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

ROP’s P/E Ratio of 37.65 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.61

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.61, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ROP

7.76

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

ROP’s P/S Ratio of 7.76 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ROP

3.10

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ROP’s P/B Ratio of 3.10 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FER vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFERROP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.0337.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.617.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.633.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.4325.39