FER vs. MTZ: Ferrovial vs. MasTec Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ) are both classified in the Construction & Engineering sub-industry within the broader Construction & Engineering industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ)
Profile Item	FER	MTZ
Name	Ferrovial N.V.	MasTec, Inc.
Country/Region	Netherlands	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Construction & Engineering
GICS Sub-Industry	Construction & Engineering	Construction & Engineering
Market Capitalization	42.19 billion USD	13.98 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	August 13, 2012	February 21, 1973
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FER

MTZ

GSPC

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ)
Metric	FER	MTZ
Total Return (1Y)	-1.10%	-7.45%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	26.01%	57.37%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	17.20%	13.96%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FER

MTZ

GSPC

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

MasTec (MTZ) has an aggressive beta of 1.91, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Ferrovial (FER) is defensive at 0.36 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk profile metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ)
Metric	FER	MTZ
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	27.38%	55.99%
Beta (5Y)	0.36	1.91
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-33.67%	-63.67%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.95M	1.63M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

FER and MTZ are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ)
Metric	FER	MTZ
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.20	-0.21
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.30	-0.28

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% and MasTec (MTZ) at 14.53% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

11.62%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
FER: 11.62%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

14.53%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
MTZ: 14.53%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15% and MasTec (MTZ) at 2.80% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.15%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
FER: 6.15%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

2.80%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
MTZ: 2.80%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% and MasTec (MTZ) at 5.64% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

10.45%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
FER: 10.45%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

5.64%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
MTZ: 5.64%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ)
Metric	FER	MTZ
ROE (TTM)	11.62%	14.53%
ROA (TTM)	2.62%	4.43%
Net Margin (TTM)	6.15%	2.80%
Operating Margin (TTM)	10.45%	5.64%
Gross Margin (TTM)	87.14%	12.74%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% and MasTec (MTZ) at 16.22% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

MasTec (MTZ) at 146.12% delivers above-range EPS growth, while Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in earnings momentum.

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ)
Metric	FER	MTZ
Revenue Growth (YoY)	5.24%	16.22%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	8.43%	13.51%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-72.26%	146.12%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	70.54%	129.40%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 and MasTec (MTZ) at 1.39 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.20

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
FER: 1.20
Min: 0.36

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

1.39

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
MTZ: 1.39
Min: 0.36

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 and MasTec (MTZ) at 1.12 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.44

Max: 2.33
FER: 1.44
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

1.12

Max: 2.33
MTZ: 1.12
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ)
Metric	FER	MTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	1.39
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.44	1.12
Net Debt / EBITDA	4.39	3.08

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MasTec (MTZ) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a yield of 0.94%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

0.94%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
FER: 0.94%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
MTZ: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MasTec (MTZ) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a payout of 71.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

71.24%

FER: 71.24%
Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
MTZ: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ)
Metric	FER	MTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.94%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	71.24%	0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 and MasTec (MTZ) at 28.40 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

32.26

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
FER: 32.26
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

28.40

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
MTZ: 28.40
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

MasTec (MTZ) at 0.81 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

4.28

Max: 7.54
FER: 4.28
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

0.81

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
MTZ: 0.81
Min: 0.03

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

MasTec (MTZ) at 3.35 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 carries an above-peer premium to book — FER is pricier on assets.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.59

Max: 9.66
FER: 6.59
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

3.35

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
MTZ: 3.35
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Ferrovial (FER) vs. MasTec (MTZ): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and MasTec (MTZ)
Metric	FER	MTZ
P/E Ratio (TTM)	32.26	28.40
P/S Ratio (TTM)	4.28	0.81
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	6.59	3.35
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.11%	1.00%