FER vs. MAS: Ferrovial vs. Masco Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FER is classified in Construction & Engineering while MAS is classified in Building Products.

Company profile comparison for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS)
Profile Item	FER	MAS
Name	Ferrovial N.V.	Masco Corporation
Country/Region	Netherlands	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Building Products
GICS Sub-Industry	Construction & Engineering	Building Products
Market Capitalization	42.19 billion USD	15.85 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	August 13, 2012	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FER

MAS

GSPC

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS)
Metric	FER	MAS
Total Return (1Y)	-1.10%	40.92%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	26.01%	17.66%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	17.20%	7.57%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FER

MAS

GSPC

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS)
Metric	FER	MAS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	27.38%	36.68%
Beta (5Y)	0.36	1.19
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-33.67%	-37.95%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.95M	2.20M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

FER and MAS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS)
Metric	FER	MAS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.20	1.00
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.30	1.60

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Ferrovial (FER) earns 11.62% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Masco (MAS) has no ROE this period.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

11.62%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
FER: 11.62%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%
MAS: --

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): MAS does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; FER is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15% and Masco (MAS) at 12.08% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.15%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
FER: 6.15%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

12.08%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
MAS: 12.08%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% and Masco (MAS) at 17.24% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

10.45%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
FER: 10.45%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

17.24%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
MAS: 17.24%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS)
Metric	FER	MAS
ROE (TTM)	11.62%	--
ROA (TTM)	2.62%	15.25%
Net Margin (TTM)	6.15%	12.08%
Operating Margin (TTM)	10.45%	17.24%
Gross Margin (TTM)	87.14%	36.61%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Masco (MAS) at -3.40% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Masco (MAS) at 2.66% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS)
Metric	FER	MAS
Revenue Growth (YoY)	5.24%	-3.40%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	8.43%	-4.49%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-72.26%	2.66%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	70.54%	2.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Masco (MAS) at 1.83 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FER.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.20

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
FER: 1.20
Min: 0.36

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

1.83

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
MAS: 1.83
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Ferrovial (FER) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.44 against its industry range, while Masco (MAS) reports no figure this period.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.44

Max: 2.33
FER: 1.44
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00
MAS: --

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): MAS does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; FER is benchmarked against the Capital Goods industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS)
Metric	FER	MAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	1.83
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.44	--
Net Debt / EBITDA	4.39	1.98

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 1.52% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ferrovial (FER) at 0.94% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, MAS the richer one.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

0.94%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
FER: 0.94%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

1.52%

Max: 2.66%
MAS: 1.52%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 27.55% keeps its payout in the industry’s typical band, while Ferrovial (FER) at 71.24% pays out more than any of its peers — the most stretched cover in its group.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

71.24%

FER: 71.24%
Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

27.55%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
MAS: 27.55%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS)
Metric	FER	MAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.94%	1.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	71.24%	27.55%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 17.84 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for MAS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

32.26

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
FER: 32.26
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

17.84

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
MAS: 17.84
Min: 3.03

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Masco (MAS) at 2.07 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 sits in the pricier quartile — FER costs more per dollar of sales.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

4.28

Max: 7.54
FER: 4.28
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

2.07

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
MAS: 2.07
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Masco (MAS) reports a negative P/B ratio of -35.38, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports 6.59, ranking against industry peers normally.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.59

Max: 9.66
FER: 6.59
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

MAS

Capital Goods industry group

-35.38

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08
MAS: -35.38

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Masco (MAS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Masco (MAS)
Metric	FER	MAS
P/E Ratio (TTM)	32.26	17.84
P/S Ratio (TTM)	4.28	2.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	6.59	-35.38
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.11%	5.15%