Seek Returns logo

FER vs. JBHT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FER and JBHT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFERJBHT
Company NameFerrovial SEJ.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
CountryNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringGround Transportation
Market Capitalization41.98 billion USD13.02 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateAugust 13, 2012November 22, 1983
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FER and JBHT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FER vs. JBHT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFERJBHT
5-Day Price Return0.99%0.21%
13-Week Price Return8.93%-12.18%
26-Week Price Return16.31%-12.02%
52-Week Price Return27.56%-23.01%
Month-to-Date Return4.48%-1.11%
Year-to-Date Return20.15%-22.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.83M1.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.64M1.07M
3-Month Volatility13.81%30.35%
Beta0.951.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

JBHT

14.26%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

In the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, JBHT’s Return on Equity of 14.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

JBHT

4.59%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

JBHT’s Net Profit Margin of 4.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

JBHT

6.69%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

JBHT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.69% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFERJBHT
Return on Equity (TTM)56.21%14.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.11%6.69%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)35.99%4.59%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)34.91%6.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)87.83%19.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

JBHT

0.87

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

JBHT’s Current Ratio of 0.87 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

JBHT

0.47

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, JBHT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JBHT

11.59

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

JBHT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFERJBHT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.940.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.860.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.950.47
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.2011.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

FER vs. JBHT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FER vs. JBHT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FER

0.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.35% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

JBHT

1.34%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

JBHT’s Dividend Yield of 1.34% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

JBHT

31.37%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

JBHT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.37% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFERJBHT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%1.34%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)3.63%31.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FER

10.41

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 10.41 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

JBHT

23.37

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

JBHT’s P/E Ratio of 23.37 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.75

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.75, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

JBHT

1.07

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

JBHT’s P/S Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

JBHT

3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

JBHT’s P/B Ratio of 3.80 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FER vs. JBHT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFERJBHT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.4123.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.751.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.633.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.5521.56
FER vs. JBHT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison