Seek Returns

FER vs. HON: Ferrovial vs. Honeywell Stock Comparison

How do Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FER is classified in Construction & Engineering while HON is classified in Industrial Conglomerates.

Company profile comparison for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON)
Profile ItemFERHON
NameFerrovial N.V.Honeywell International Inc.
Country/RegionNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringIndustrial Conglomerates
GICS Sub-IndustryConstruction & EngineeringIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization42.19 billion USD69.74 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNasdaq
Listing DateAugust 13, 2012January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FER
HON
GSPC
Loading price history…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON)
MetricFERHON
Total Return (1Y)-1.10%14.14%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)26.01%9.90%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)17.20%2.32%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FER
HON
GSPC
Loading price history…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON)
MetricFERHON
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)27.38%27.11%
Beta (5Y)0.360.80
Max Drawdown (5Y)-33.67%-25.21%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.95M2.82M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FER and HON are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON)
MetricFERHON
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.200.36
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.300.52

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Honeywell (HON) at 44.39% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

11.62%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FER
11.62%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

HON

Capital Goods industry group

44.39%

HON
44.39%
Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Honeywell (HON) at 18.68% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.15%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
FER
6.15%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

HON

Capital Goods industry group

18.68%

Max
27.47%
HON
18.68%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% and Honeywell (HON) at 16.92% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

10.45%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
FER
10.45%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

HON

Capital Goods industry group

16.92%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
HON
16.92%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON)
MetricFERHON
ROE (TTM)11.62%44.39%
ROA (TTM)2.62%7.13%
Net Margin (TTM)6.15%18.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)10.45%16.92%
Gross Margin (TTM)87.14%37.21%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% and Honeywell (HON) at 7.85% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Honeywell (HON) at -8.27% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON)
MetricFERHON
Revenue Growth (YoY)5.24%7.85%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)8.43%1.82%
EPS Growth (YoY)-72.26%-8.27%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)70.54%3.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 and Honeywell (HON) at 0.96 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.20

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
FER
1.20
Min
0.36

HON

Capital Goods industry group

0.96

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
HON
0.96
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Honeywell (HON) at 0.76 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 uses more debt funding than most peers.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.44

Max
2.33
FER
1.44
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

HON

Capital Goods industry group

0.76

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
HON
0.76
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON)
MetricFERHON
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.200.96
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.440.76
Net Debt / EBITDA4.391.23

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Ferrovial (FER) at 0.94% pays an industry-typical yield; Honeywell (HON) at 3.63% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

0.94%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FER
0.94%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HON

Capital Goods industry group

3.63%

HON
3.63%
Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both pay out more than their industries’ typical bands, and FER more so: Honeywell (HON) at 38.87% sits above the band, while Ferrovial (FER) at 71.24% exceeds every peer in its group.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

71.24%

FER
71.24%
Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HON

Capital Goods industry group

38.87%

Max
67.39%
HON
38.87%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON)
MetricFERHON
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.94%3.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)71.24%38.87%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Honeywell (HON) at 10.91 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for HON, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

32.26

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
FER
32.26
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

HON

Capital Goods industry group

10.91

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
HON
10.91
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Honeywell (HON) at 1.85 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 sits in the pricier quartile — FER costs more per dollar of sales.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

4.28

Max
7.54
FER
4.28
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

HON

Capital Goods industry group

1.85

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
HON
1.85
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Honeywell (HON) at 3.12 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 carries an above-peer premium to book — FER is pricier on assets.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.59

Max
9.66
FER
6.59
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

HON

Capital Goods industry group

3.12

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
HON
3.12
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Ferrovial (FER) vs. Honeywell (HON): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell (HON)
MetricFERHON
P/E Ratio (TTM)32.2610.91
P/S Ratio (TTM)4.281.85
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.593.12
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.11%10.07%