Seek Returns logo

FELE vs. ITW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FELE and ITW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFELEITW
Company NameFranklin Electric Co., Inc.Illinois Tool Works Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryMachinery
Market Capitalization4.24 billion USD76.09 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 13, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FELE and ITW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FELE vs. ITW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFELEITW
5-Day Price Return1.62%0.46%
13-Week Price Return6.08%5.46%
26-Week Price Return-2.83%1.90%
52-Week Price Return-9.35%-1.22%
Month-to-Date Return-2.72%-1.47%
Year-to-Date Return-2.31%2.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.28M0.89M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.26M0.92M
3-Month Volatility22.39%17.68%
Beta1.101.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FELE

14.08%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

FELE’s Return on Equity of 14.08% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ITW

102.30%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

ITW’s Return on Equity of 102.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FELE

8.71%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

FELE’s Net Profit Margin of 8.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ITW

21.31%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

ITW’s Net Profit Margin of 21.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FELE

12.08%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

FELE’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.08% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ITW

25.98%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.98% places ITW in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFELEITW
Return on Equity (TTM)14.08%102.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.47%21.57%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.71%21.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.08%25.98%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.42%43.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FELE

1.72

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

FELE’s Current Ratio of 1.72 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ITW

1.59

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

ITW’s Current Ratio of 1.59 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FELE

0.23

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FELE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ITW

2.78

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.78, ITW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FELE

18.65

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

FELE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.65 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ITW

20.06

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

ITW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFELEITW
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.721.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.771.04
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.232.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.6520.06

Growth

Revenue Growth

FELE vs. ITW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FELE vs. ITW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FELE

1.15%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

FELE’s Dividend Yield of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ITW

2.30%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

ITW’s Dividend Yield of 2.30% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FELE

26.88%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

FELE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.88% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ITW

51.65%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

ITW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.65% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFELEITW
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.15%2.30%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.88%51.65%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FELE

23.45

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

FELE’s P/E Ratio of 23.45 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ITW

22.49

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

ITW’s P/E Ratio of 22.49 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FELE

2.04

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

FELE’s P/S Ratio of 2.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ITW

4.79

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

ITW’s P/S Ratio of 4.79 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FELE

3.24

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

FELE’s P/B Ratio of 3.24 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ITW

22.57

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

At 22.57, ITW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FELE vs. ITW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFELEITW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.4522.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.044.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.2422.57
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.2427.78