FDS vs. UBS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FDS and UBS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FDS	UBS
Company Name	FactSet Research Systems Inc.	UBS Group AG
Country	United States	Switzerland
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	14.22 billion USD	125.66 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 28, 1996	May 16, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FDS and UBS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FDS vs. UBS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FDS	UBS
5-Day Price Return	-2.71%	3.81%
13-Week Price Return	-17.57%	23.63%
26-Week Price Return	-19.83%	0.22%
52-Week Price Return	-5.25%	31.64%
Month-to-Date Return	-6.63%	4.66%
Year-to-Date Return	-21.67%	14.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.47M	8.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.35M	7.80M
3-Month Volatility	20.09%	24.71%
Beta	0.84	1.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FDS

26.26%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FDS’s Return on Equity of 26.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBS

7.21%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

UBS’s Return on Equity of 7.21% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FDS

23.30%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

FDS’s Net Profit Margin of 23.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBS

77.37%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

UBS’s Net Profit Margin of 77.37% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FDS

30.56%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

FDS’s Operating Profit Margin of 30.56% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBS

81.44%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 81.44% places UBS in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FDS	UBS
Return on Equity (TTM)	26.26%	7.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)	12.78%	0.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	23.30%	77.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	30.56%	81.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	53.33%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FDS

1.47

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

UBS

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FDS

0.66

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

UBS

4.21

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FDS

13.69

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

UBS

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FDS	UBS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.47	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.24	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.66	4.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	13.69	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

FDS vs. UBS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FDS vs. UBS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FDS

1.11%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

FDS’s Dividend Yield of 1.11% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

UBS

2.27%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

UBS’s Dividend Yield of 2.27% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FDS

29.59%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

FDS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.59% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

UBS

119.67%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

UBS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 119.67% is in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FDS	UBS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.11%	2.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	29.59%	119.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FDS

26.71

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

FDS’s P/E Ratio of 26.71 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBS

20.12

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

UBS’s P/E Ratio of 20.12 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FDS

6.22

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

FDS’s P/S Ratio of 6.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBS

2.27

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

UBS’s P/S Ratio of 2.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FDS

8.04

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

FDS’s P/B Ratio of 8.04 is in the upper tier for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBS

1.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

UBS’s P/B Ratio of 1.25 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FDS vs. UBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FDS	UBS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	26.71	20.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	6.22	2.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	8.04	1.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	24.69	5.42