FDS vs. STT: FactSet Research Systems vs. State Street Stock Comparison

Company Profile

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) and State Street (STT) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though FDS is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while STT falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

State Street (STT) has an aggressive beta of 1.36, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) is defensive at 0.69 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 25.48% sits in the top ROE quartile, while State Street (STT) at 13.08% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FDS.

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 21.54% and State Street (STT) at 23.78% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 22.22% and State Street (STT) at 34.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 6.65% and State Street (STT) at 8.10% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at -6.30% and State Street (STT) at 14.49% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: FactSet Research Systems (FDS) in Financial Services and State Street (STT) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: FactSet Research Systems (FDS) in Financial Services and State Street (STT) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 1.33% and State Street (STT) at 2.08% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 31.02% and State Street (STT) at 28.10% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 22.50 and State Street (STT) at 13.53 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

State Street (STT) at 2.91 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 4.67 sits in the pricier quartile — FDS costs more per dollar of sales.

State Street (STT) at 1.83 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 5.77 carries an above-peer premium to book — FDS is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics