FCPT vs. KIM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 5, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FCPT and KIM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both FCPT and KIM are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

Symbol	FCPT	KIM
Company Name	Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.	Kimco Realty Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Real Estate	Real Estate
GICS Industry	Specialized REITs	Retail REITs
Market Capitalization	2.53 billion USD	14.54 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 10, 2015	November 22, 1991
Security Type	REIT	REIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FCPT and KIM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FCPT vs. KIM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FCPT	KIM
5-Day Price Return	-0.45%	-0.92%
13-Week Price Return	-10.74%	-0.69%
26-Week Price Return	-15.47%	1.08%
52-Week Price Return	-16.40%	-6.49%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.57%	-1.74%
Year-to-Date Return	-10.61%	-8.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.75M	3.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.65M	4.05M
3-Month Volatility	15.77%	19.19%
Beta	0.88	1.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FCPT

7.41%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 21.01%
Q3: 17.78%
Median: 8.42%
Q1: 6.83%
Min: -1.71%

FCPT’s Return on Equity of 7.41% is on par with the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 16.17%
Q3: 9.03%
Median: 6.12%
Q1: 3.81%
Min: -3.17%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FCPT

37.87%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 70.20%
Q3: 38.00%
Median: 23.98%
Q1: 6.53%
Min: -1.41%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 75.53%
Q3: 49.82%
Median: 28.35%
Q1: 20.68%
Min: -8.79%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FCPT

55.71%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 107.13%
Q3: 54.03%
Median: 42.12%
Q1: 16.28%
Min: 5.86%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 102.11%
Q3: 58.14%
Median: 38.63%
Q1: 25.00%
Min: -8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FCPT	KIM
Return on Equity (TTM)	7.41%	5.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.96%	2.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	37.87%	28.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	55.71%	32.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	68.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FCPT

0.17

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 1.74
Q3: 1.08
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.34
Min: 0.10

FCPT’s Current Ratio of 0.17 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 1.74
Q3: 0.97
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.07

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FCPT

0.81

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 5.86
Q3: 3.80
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.16

FCPT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81 is typical for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 2.06
Q3: 1.27
Median: 0.92
Q1: 0.68
Min: 0.34

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FCPT

3.05

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 5.24
Q3: 3.92
Median: 2.94
Q1: 2.07
Min: 1.14

FCPT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 4.31
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.29
Min: -0.08

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FCPT	KIM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.17	1.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.14	1.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.81	0.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	3.05	2.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

FCPT vs. KIM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FCPT vs. KIM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FCPT

5.33%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 6.92%
Q3: 5.29%
Median: 4.71%
Q1: 3.25%
Min: 2.16%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.33%, FCPT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

KIM

4.85%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 6.92%
Q3: 5.10%
Median: 4.50%
Q1: 3.89%
Min: 2.37%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.85% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FCPT

128.20%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 338.69%
Q3: 202.75%
Median: 125.21%
Q1: 107.89%
Min: 16.73%

FCPT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 128.20% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 195.40%
Q3: 125.60%
Median: 85.02%
Q1: 51.07%
Min: 12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FCPT	KIM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	5.33%	4.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	128.20%	117.45%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FCPT

24.03

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 119.95
Q3: 64.19
Median: 27.78
Q1: 23.88
Min: 5.25

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

KIM

24.20

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 42.04
Q3: 28.02
Median: 21.98
Q1: 15.79
Min: 6.89

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FCPT

9.10

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 10.35
Q3: 8.84
Median: 8.28
Q1: 5.39
Min: 1.68

FCPT’s P/S Ratio of 9.10 is in the upper echelon for the Specialized REITs industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KIM

6.91

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 13.05
Q3: 9.54
Median: 6.95
Q1: 5.59
Min: 3.06

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 6.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FCPT

1.83

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 13.73
Q3: 7.48
Median: 2.56
Q1: 1.70
Min: 0.71

FCPT’s P/B Ratio of 1.83 is within the conventional range for the Specialized REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 2.70
Q3: 1.64
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.91
Min: 0.58

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FCPT vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FCPT	KIM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	24.03	24.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	9.10	6.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.83	1.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	73.12	29.77