FANG vs. YPF: Diamondback Energy vs. YPF Stock Comparison
How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and YPF (YPF) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Diamondback Energy (FANG) and YPF (YPF) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though FANG is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while YPF falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.
Diamondback Energy (FANG) trades as ordinary local shares, while YPF (YPF) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | FANG | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Diamondback Energy Inc. | YPF Sociedad Anónima Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Argentina |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 49.96 billion USD | 15.16 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 12, 2012 | June 29, 1993 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FANG | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 26.99% | 4.12% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 8.52% | 55.92% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.17% | 52.62% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
YPF (YPF) has an aggressive beta of 1.38, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) is defensive at 0.53 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | FANG | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.77% | 39.02% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 1.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.10% | -48.79% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.38M | 1.23M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FANG | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.67 | -0.00 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.97 | -0.01 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and YPF (YPF) at 17.41% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
YPF
Energy industry group
17.41%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- YPF
- 17.41%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and YPF (YPF) at 9.76% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
YPF
Energy industry group
9.76%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- YPF
- 9.76%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of YPF (YPF) at 29.16%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
YPF
Energy industry group
29.16%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- YPF
- 29.16%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FANG | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 4.86% | 17.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.07% | 9.92% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.62% | 9.76% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.95% | 29.16% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.62% | 38.74% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while YPF (YPF) at -4.39% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.
EPS Growth
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% and YPF (YPF) at -135.23% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FANG | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 35.44% | -4.39% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.99% | -0.28% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -63.10% | -135.23% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -38.48% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
YPF (YPF) at 1.24 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
YPF
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- YPF
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while YPF (YPF) at 0.79 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
YPF
Energy industry group
0.79
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- YPF
- 0.79
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FANG | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.55 | 1.24 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.79 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.99 | 0.96 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
YPF (YPF) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Diamondback Energy (FANG) reports a yield of 2.47%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YPF
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- YPF
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
YPF (YPF) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Diamondback Energy (FANG) reports a payout of 57.20%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YPF
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- YPF
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FANG | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.47% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 57.20% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
YPF (YPF) at 7.12 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
YPF
Energy industry group
7.12
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- YPF
- 7.12
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
YPF (YPF) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 prices around its industry’s middle — YPF costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
YPF
Energy industry group
0.00
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- YPF
- 0.00
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 and YPF (YPF) at 1.12 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
YPF
Energy industry group
1.12
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- YPF
- 1.12
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FANG | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.09 | 7.12 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.83 | 0.00 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.28 | 1.12 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.09% | 5,553.69% |