FANG vs. VG: Diamondback Energy vs. Venture Global Stock Comparison
How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Venture Global (VG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Venture Global (VG) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Diamondback Energy (FANG) has been public since October 12, 2012, giving it a longer listed trading history, while Venture Global (VG) listed on January 24, 2025 and still has a shorter public-market record.
| Profile Item | FANG | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Diamondback Energy Inc. | Venture Global Inc. Class A |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 49.96 billion USD | 28.83 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 12, 2012 | January 24, 2025 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 26.99% | 49.08% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 8.52% | -- |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.17% | -- |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.77% | 75.79% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.48 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.10% | -75.16% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.38M | 14.78M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.67 | 0.59 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.97 | 0.90 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Venture Global (VG) at 33.64% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for VG.
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
VG
Energy industry group
33.64%
- Max
- 53.85%
- VG
- 33.64%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and Venture Global (VG) at 22.05% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
VG
Energy industry group
22.05%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- VG
- 22.05%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% and Venture Global (VG) at 47.79% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
VG
Energy industry group
47.79%
- Max
- 71.31%
- VG
- 47.79%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 4.86% | 33.64% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.07% | 7.38% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.62% | 22.05% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.95% | 47.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.62% | 46.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both companies are growing quickly, but Venture Global (VG) at 176.93% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% also sits in the top quartile.
EPS Growth
Venture Global (VG) at 41.08% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 35.44% | 176.93% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.99% | 28.77% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -63.10% | 41.08% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -38.48% | 6.05% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Venture Global (VG) at 1.19 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
VG
Energy industry group
1.19
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- VG
- 1.19
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Venture Global (VG) at 3.55 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
VG
Energy industry group
3.55
- VG
- 3.55
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.55 | 1.19 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 3.55 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.99 | 5.40 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and Venture Global (VG) at 0.61% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VG
Energy industry group
0.61%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- VG
- 0.61%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Venture Global (VG) at 5.51% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VG
Energy industry group
5.51%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- VG
- 5.51%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.47% | 0.61% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 57.20% | 5.51% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Venture Global (VG) at 9.08 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
VG
Energy industry group
9.08
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- VG
- 9.08
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 and Venture Global (VG) at 1.70 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
VG
Energy industry group
1.70
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- VG
- 1.70
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Venture Global (VG) at 3.36 carries an above-peer premium to book — VG is pricier on assets.
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
VG
Energy industry group
3.36
- Max
- 4.21
- VG
- 3.36
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.09 | 9.08 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.83 | 1.70 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.28 | 3.36 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.09% | -29.96% |