FANG vs. TS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at FANG and TS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
FANG is a standard domestic listing, while TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.
Symbol | FANG | TS |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Diamondback Energy, Inc. | Tenaris S.A. |
Country | United States | Luxembourg |
GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Energy Equipment & Services |
Market Capitalization | 42.69 billion USD | 19.50 billion USD |
Exchange | NasdaqGS | NYSE |
Listing Date | October 12, 2012 | December 16, 2002 |
Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of FANG and TS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
Symbol | FANG | TS |
---|---|---|
5-Day Price Return | 2.71% | 2.14% |
13-Week Price Return | 4.66% | -5.02% |
26-Week Price Return | -7.76% | -14.39% |
52-Week Price Return | -18.66% | 5.51% |
Month-to-Date Return | 3.05% | 2.04% |
Year-to-Date Return | -9.99% | -14.22% |
10-Day Avg. Volume | 1.99M | 2.47M |
3-Month Avg. Volume | 2.19M | 2.15M |
3-Month Volatility | 29.41% | 23.39% |
Beta | 0.62 | 0.72 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
FANG
10.06%
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 27.06%
- Q3
- 16.37%
- Median
- 10.02%
- Q1
- 5.32%
- Min
- -8.98%
FANG’s Return on Equity of 10.06% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
TS
11.86%
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 35.03%
- Q3
- 19.11%
- Median
- 12.78%
- Q1
- 7.55%
- Min
- -1.07%
TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
FANG
27.25%
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 48.48%
- Q3
- 21.05%
- Median
- 9.42%
- Q1
- 1.67%
- Min
- -26.95%
A Net Profit Margin of 27.25% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
TS
17.02%
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 17.17%
- Q3
- 9.96%
- Median
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 3.84%
- Min
- -0.90%
A Net Profit Margin of 17.02% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
FANG
35.43%
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 62.28%
- Q3
- 31.04%
- Median
- 18.00%
- Q1
- 5.41%
- Min
- -32.54%
An Operating Profit Margin of 35.43% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
TS
18.93%
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 31.93%
- Q3
- 18.93%
- Median
- 11.31%
- Q1
- 4.98%
- Min
- 0.83%
TS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
Symbol | FANG | TS |
---|---|---|
Return on Equity (TTM) | 10.06% | 11.86% |
Return on Assets (TTM) | 5.58% | 9.70% |
Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 27.25% | 17.02% |
Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 35.43% | 18.93% |
Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 70.77% | 33.79% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
FANG
0.55
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 2.60
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 1.22
- Q1
- 0.86
- Min
- 0.30
FANG’s Current Ratio of 0.55 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
TS
3.41
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 2.08
- Median
- 1.38
- Q1
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.68
TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
FANG
0.39
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 2.16
- Q3
- 1.06
- Median
- 0.53
- Q1
- 0.25
- Min
- 0.00
FANG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
TS
0.03
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 2.06
- Q3
- 1.10
- Median
- 0.48
- Q1
- 0.34
- Min
- 0.02
Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
FANG
12.06
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 51.08
- Q3
- 22.26
- Median
- 7.32
- Q1
- 2.72
- Min
- -19.25
FANG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
TS
101.80
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 49.88
- Q3
- 26.65
- Median
- 7.66
- Q1
- 2.15
- Min
- -17.36
With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.
Financial Strength at a Glance
Symbol | FANG | TS |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.55 | 3.41 |
Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.50 | 2.11 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.39 | 0.03 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 12.06 | 101.80 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
FANG
3.04%
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 12.74%
- Q3
- 7.02%
- Median
- 4.37%
- Q1
- 2.64%
- Min
- 0.00%
FANG’s Dividend Yield of 3.04% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
TS
4.61%
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 8.36%
- Q3
- 4.38%
- Median
- 2.41%
- Q1
- 0.32%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 4.61%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
FANG
32.81%
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 188.73%
- Q3
- 95.12%
- Median
- 63.48%
- Q1
- 28.55%
- Min
- 0.00%
FANG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.81% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
TS
85.87%
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 169.85%
- Q3
- 94.25%
- Median
- 39.49%
- Q1
- 15.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
Dividend at a Glance
Symbol | FANG | TS |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 4.61% |
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 32.81% | 85.87% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
FANG
10.80
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 34.98
- Q3
- 21.60
- Median
- 13.15
- Q1
- 8.17
- Min
- 2.22
FANG’s P/E Ratio of 10.80 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
TS
9.74
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 22.89
- Q3
- 18.22
- Median
- 13.03
- Q1
- 11.98
- Min
- 7.14
In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.74 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
FANG
2.94
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 4.68
- Q3
- 2.73
- Median
- 1.36
- Q1
- 0.54
- Min
- 0.12
FANG’s P/S Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper echelon for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
TS
1.66
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 2.84
- Q3
- 1.60
- Median
- 0.87
- Q1
- 0.54
- Min
- 0.23
TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.66 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
FANG
1.03
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry
- Max
- 3.63
- Q3
- 2.11
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.91
- Min
- 0.34
FANG’s P/B Ratio of 1.03 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
TS
1.21
Energy Equipment & Services Industry
- Max
- 4.44
- Q3
- 2.60
- Median
- 1.77
- Q1
- 1.17
- Min
- 0.24
TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
Symbol | FANG | TS |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 10.80 | 9.74 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.94 | 1.66 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 1.03 | 1.21 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 20.86 | 10.47 |