FANG vs. TS: Diamondback Energy vs. Tenaris Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS) both fall under the Energy industry group, but FANG is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while TS is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.

Diamondback Energy (FANG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Tenaris (TS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS)
Profile Item	FANG	TS
Name	Diamondback Energy Inc.	Tenaris S.A. American Depositary Shares
Country/Region	United States	Luxembourg
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry Group	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Energy Equipment & Services
GICS Sub-Industry	Oil & Gas Exploration & Production	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization	49.96 billion USD	29.71 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	October 12, 2012	December 16, 2002
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FANG

GSPC

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS)
Metric	FANG	TS
Total Return (1Y)	26.99%	49.29%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	8.52%	24.84%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	14.17%	22.48%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FANG

GSPC

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS)
Metric	FANG	TS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	33.77%	29.07%
Beta (5Y)	0.53	0.88
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-42.10%	-33.71%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.38M	1.24M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

FANG and TS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS)
Metric	FANG	TS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.67	1.55
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.97	2.30

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and Tenaris (TS) at 11.86% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
FANG: 4.86%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

TS

Energy industry group

11.86%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
TS: 11.86%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and Tenaris (TS) at 16.24% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
FANG: 11.62%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

TS

Energy industry group

16.24%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
TS: 16.24%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Tenaris (TS) at 19.26%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max: 71.31%
FANG: 44.95%
Q3: 33.75%
Median: 18.73%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

TS

Energy industry group

19.26%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
TS: 19.26%
Median: 18.73%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS)
Metric	FANG	TS
ROE (TTM)	4.86%	11.86%
ROA (TTM)	2.07%	6.69%
Net Margin (TTM)	11.62%	16.24%
Operating Margin (TTM)	44.95%	19.26%
Gross Margin (TTM)	73.62%	38.54%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Tenaris (TS) at -4.33% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Tenaris (TS) at 1.11% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS)
Metric	FANG	TS
Revenue Growth (YoY)	35.44%	-4.33%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	15.99%	0.62%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-63.10%	1.11%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-38.48%	-5.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Tenaris (TS) at 3.25 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
Q1: 0.88
FANG: 0.55
Min: 0.24

TS

Energy industry group

3.25

Max: 3.64
TS: 3.25
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 and Tenaris (TS) at 0.03 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.30
FANG: 0.29
Min: 0.00

TS

Energy industry group

0.03

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.30
TS: 0.03
Min: 0.00

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS)
Metric	FANG	TS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.55	3.25
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.29	0.03
Net Debt / EBITDA	0.99	-0.90

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and Tenaris (TS) at 2.11% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
FANG: 2.47%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TS

Energy industry group

2.11%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
TS: 2.11%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Tenaris (TS) at 45.64% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max: 133.24%
FANG: 57.20%
Q3: 53.31%
Median: 25.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TS

Energy industry group

45.64%

Max: 133.24%
Q3: 53.31%
TS: 45.64%
Median: 25.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS)
Metric	FANG	TS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.47%	2.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	57.20%	45.64%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Tenaris (TS) at 15.09 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max: 39.54
FANG: 24.09
Q3: 21.72
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

TS

Energy industry group

15.09

Max: 39.54
Q3: 21.72
TS: 15.09
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 and Tenaris (TS) at 2.44 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
FANG: 2.83
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

TS

Energy industry group

2.44

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
TS: 2.44
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Tenaris (TS) at 3.53 carries an above-peer premium to book — TS is pricier on assets.

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
FANG: 1.28
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

TS

Energy industry group

3.53

Max: 4.21
TS: 3.53
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Tenaris (TS)
Metric	FANG	TS
P/E Ratio (TTM)	24.09	15.09
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.83	2.44
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	1.28	3.53
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	12.09%	6.50%