Seek Returns logo

FANG vs. TS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FANG and TS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FANG is a standard domestic listing, while TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFANGTS
Company NameDiamondback Energy, Inc.Tenaris S.A.
CountryUnited StatesLuxembourg
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization42.69 billion USD19.50 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012December 16, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FANG and TS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FANG vs. TS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFANGTS
5-Day Price Return2.71%2.14%
13-Week Price Return4.66%-5.02%
26-Week Price Return-7.76%-14.39%
52-Week Price Return-18.66%5.51%
Month-to-Date Return3.05%2.04%
Year-to-Date Return-9.99%-14.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.99M2.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.19M2.15M
3-Month Volatility29.41%23.39%
Beta0.620.72

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FANG

10.06%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

FANG’s Return on Equity of 10.06% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TS

11.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FANG

27.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.25% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TS

17.02%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.02% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FANG

35.43%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

An Operating Profit Margin of 35.43% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TS

18.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

TS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFANGTS
Return on Equity (TTM)10.06%11.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.58%9.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.25%17.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)35.43%18.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.77%33.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

0.55

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

FANG’s Current Ratio of 0.55 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TS

3.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

0.39

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

FANG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FANG

12.06

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

FANG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFANGTS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.553.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.502.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.06101.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

FANG vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FANG vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FANG

3.04%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

FANG’s Dividend Yield of 3.04% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TS

4.61%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.61%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FANG

32.81%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

FANG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.81% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFANGTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.04%4.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)32.81%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FANG

10.80

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

FANG’s P/E Ratio of 10.80 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TS

9.74

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.74 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FANG

2.94

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

FANG’s P/S Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper echelon for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TS

1.66

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.66 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

1.03

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

FANG’s P/B Ratio of 1.03 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TS

1.21

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FANG vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFANGTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.809.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.941.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.031.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.8610.47