Seek Returns logo

FANG vs. TPL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FANG and TPL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFANGTPL
Company NameDiamondback Energy, Inc.Texas Pacific Land Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization40.52 billion USD20.28 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FANG and TPL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FANG vs. TPL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFANGTPL
5-Day Price Return-0.81%1.72%
13-Week Price Return-2.06%-34.20%
26-Week Price Return-12.53%-34.08%
52-Week Price Return-30.46%5.97%
Month-to-Date Return-5.84%-8.86%
Year-to-Date Return-14.56%-20.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.47M0.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.43M0.14M
3-Month Volatility31.63%37.67%
Beta1.031.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FANG

10.06%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

FANG’s Return on Equity of 10.06% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TPL

39.47%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

TPL’s Return on Equity of 39.47% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FANG

27.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.25% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TPL

62.16%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

TPL’s Net Profit Margin of 62.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FANG

35.43%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

An Operating Profit Margin of 35.43% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TPL

75.88%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

TPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 75.88% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFANGTPL
Return on Equity (TTM)10.06%39.47%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.58%35.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.25%62.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)35.43%75.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.77%94.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

0.55

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

FANG’s Current Ratio of 0.55 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TPL

14.58

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

TPL’s Current Ratio of 14.58 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

0.39

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

FANG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPL

0.00

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, TPL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FANG

12.06

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

FANG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TPL

--

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TPL is currently unavailable.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFANGTPL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.5514.58
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.5014.38
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.06--

Growth

Revenue Growth

FANG vs. TPL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FANG vs. TPL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FANG

3.14%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

FANG’s Dividend Yield of 3.14% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TPL

1.86%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

TPL’s Dividend Yield of 1.86% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FANG

32.81%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

FANG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.81% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TPL

79.64%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

TPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.64% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFANGTPL
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.14%1.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)32.81%79.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FANG

10.45

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

FANG’s P/E Ratio of 10.45 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TPL

42.90

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

At 42.90, TPL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FANG

2.85

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

FANG’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TPL

26.66

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 26.66, TPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

1.03

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

FANG’s P/B Ratio of 1.03 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TPL

18.84

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

At 18.84, TPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FANG vs. TPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFANGTPL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.4542.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.8526.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.0318.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.1876.98