FANG vs. TPL: Diamondback Energy vs. Texas Pacific Land Stock Comparison
How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | FANG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Diamondback Energy Inc. | Texas Pacific Land Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 49.96 billion USD | 18.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 12, 2012 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 26.99% | -14.10% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 8.52% | 16.13% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.17% | 13.42% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.77% | 49.74% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.62 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.10% | -52.50% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.38M | 380.93K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.67 | -0.37 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.97 | -0.50 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 37.07% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for TPL.
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
TPL
Energy industry group
37.07%
- Max
- 53.85%
- TPL
- 37.07%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 60.71% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
TPL
Energy industry group
60.71%
- TPL
- 60.71%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 76.20% shows unusually strong operating efficiency — above its industry’s operating margin range — and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% also operates in the top quartile.
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
TPL
Energy industry group
76.20%
- TPL
- 76.20%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 4.86% | 37.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.07% | 26.08% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.62% | 60.71% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.95% | 76.20% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.62% | 94.09% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 13.09% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.
EPS Growth
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 6.04% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 35.44% | 13.09% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.99% | 6.15% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -63.10% | 6.04% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -38.48% | 2.78% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 5.41 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
TPL
Energy industry group
5.41
- TPL
- 5.41
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.01 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
TPL
Energy industry group
0.01
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- TPL
- 0.01
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.55 | 5.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.99 | -0.44 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.86% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TPL
Energy industry group
0.86%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- TPL
- 0.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 27.42% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TPL
Energy industry group
27.42%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- TPL
- 27.42%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.47% | 0.86% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 57.20% | 27.42% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 32.00 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
TPL
Energy industry group
32.00
- Max
- 39.54
- TPL
- 32.00
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 19.41 clears its benchmark range — TPL looks notably rich on sales.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
TPL
Energy industry group
19.41
- TPL
- 19.41
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 10.42 prices above its benchmark range — TPL looks rich relative to book.
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
TPL
Energy industry group
10.42
- TPL
- 10.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.09 | 32.00 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.83 | 19.41 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.28 | 10.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.09% | 0.43% |