Seek Returns logo

FANG vs. GLNG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FANG and GLNG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFANGGLNG
Company NameDiamondback Energy, Inc.Golar LNG Limited
CountryUnited StatesBermuda
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization42.69 billion USD4.02 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012July 15, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FANG and GLNG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FANG vs. GLNG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFANGGLNG
5-Day Price Return2.71%-2.24%
13-Week Price Return4.66%-5.28%
26-Week Price Return-7.76%3.45%
52-Week Price Return-18.66%1.16%
Month-to-Date Return3.05%-2.75%
Year-to-Date Return-9.99%-7.14%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.99M1.22M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.19M1.30M
3-Month Volatility29.41%26.73%
Beta0.620.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FANG

10.06%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

FANG’s Return on Equity of 10.06% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GLNG

-0.33%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

GLNG has a negative Return on Equity of -0.33%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FANG

27.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.25% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GLNG

-2.40%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

GLNG has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.40%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FANG

35.43%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

An Operating Profit Margin of 35.43% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GLNG

-6.14%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

GLNG has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -6.14%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFANGGLNG
Return on Equity (TTM)10.06%-0.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.58%-0.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.25%-2.40%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)35.43%-6.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.77%54.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

0.55

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

FANG’s Current Ratio of 0.55 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GLNG

1.47

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

GLNG’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

0.39

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

FANG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GLNG

1.03

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

GLNG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.03 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FANG

12.06

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

FANG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GLNG

1.01

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, GLNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.01 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFANGGLNG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.551.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.501.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.391.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.061.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

FANG vs. GLNG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FANG vs. GLNG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FANG

3.04%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

FANG’s Dividend Yield of 3.04% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GLNG

2.56%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

GLNG’s Dividend Yield of 2.56% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FANG

32.81%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

FANG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.81% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GLNG

276.89%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

At 276.89%, GLNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFANGGLNG
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.04%2.56%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)32.81%276.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FANG

10.80

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

FANG’s P/E Ratio of 10.80 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GLNG

--

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

P/E Ratio data for GLNG is currently unavailable.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FANG

2.94

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

FANG’s P/S Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper echelon for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GLNG

15.16

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

With a P/S Ratio of 15.16, GLNG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

1.03

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

FANG’s P/B Ratio of 1.03 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GLNG

2.28

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

GLNG’s P/B Ratio of 2.28 is in the upper tier for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FANG vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFANGGLNG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.80--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.9415.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.032.28
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.86147.62