Seek Returns logo

FANG vs. FSLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FANG and FSLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFANGFSLR
Company NameDiamondback Energy, Inc.First Solar, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization40.52 billion USD19.82 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012November 17, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FANG and FSLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FANG vs. FSLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFANGFSLR
5-Day Price Return-0.81%-0.41%
13-Week Price Return-2.06%18.33%
26-Week Price Return-12.53%10.24%
52-Week Price Return-30.46%-15.69%
Month-to-Date Return-5.84%5.79%
Year-to-Date Return-14.56%4.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.47M2.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.43M4.42M
3-Month Volatility31.63%78.91%
Beta1.031.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FANG

10.06%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

FANG’s Return on Equity of 10.06% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FSLR

15.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

FSLR’s Return on Equity of 15.57% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FANG

27.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.25% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FSLR

28.95%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.95% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FANG

35.43%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

An Operating Profit Margin of 35.43% places FANG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FSLR

31.35%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.35% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFANGFSLR
Return on Equity (TTM)10.06%15.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.58%10.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.25%28.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)35.43%31.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.77%42.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

0.55

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

FANG’s Current Ratio of 0.55 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FSLR

1.90

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

FSLR’s Current Ratio of 1.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

0.39

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

FANG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FSLR

0.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

FSLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FANG

12.06

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

FANG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FSLR

39.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

FSLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFANGFSLR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.551.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.501.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.0639.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

FANG vs. FSLR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FANG vs. FSLR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FANG

3.14%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

FANG’s Dividend Yield of 3.14% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FANG

32.81%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

FANG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.81% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFANGFSLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.14%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)32.81%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FANG

10.45

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

FANG’s P/E Ratio of 10.45 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FSLR

15.85

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, FSLR’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FANG

2.85

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

FANG’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FSLR

4.59

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

FSLR’s P/S Ratio of 4.59 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FANG

1.03

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

FANG’s P/B Ratio of 1.03 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FSLR

2.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

FSLR’s P/B Ratio of 2.08 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FANG vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFANGFSLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.4515.85
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.854.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.032.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.1840.07