Seek Returns logo

FA vs. RELX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FA and RELX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FA is a standard domestic listing, while RELX trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFARELX
Company NameFirst Advantage CorporationRELX PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization2.87 billion USD89.37 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 23, 2021October 6, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FA and RELX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FA vs. RELX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFARELX
5-Day Price Return-1.84%1.14%
13-Week Price Return-9.19%-13.66%
26-Week Price Return-17.49%-14.41%
52-Week Price Return-8.48%0.11%
Month-to-Date Return-4.51%-10.09%
Year-to-Date Return-11.85%-2.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.96M2.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.07M2.48M
3-Month Volatility43.05%16.41%
Beta1.270.72

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FA

-12.49%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

FA has a negative Return on Equity of -12.49%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

RELX

68.01%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

RELX’s Return on Equity of 68.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FA

-11.99%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

FA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -11.99%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

RELX

20.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.19% places RELX in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FA

-2.15%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

FA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.15%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

RELX

30.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.62% places RELX in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFARELX
Return on Equity (TTM)-12.49%68.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)-4.51%13.07%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-11.99%20.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.15%30.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.48%65.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FA

1.98

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

FA’s Current Ratio of 1.98 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

RELX

0.47

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

RELX’s Current Ratio of 0.47 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FA

1.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

FA’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Professional Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.64. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RELX

3.46

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.46, RELX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FA

-1.21

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

FA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.21. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RELX

11.07

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

RELX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFARELX
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.980.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.880.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.643.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-1.2111.07

Growth

Revenue Growth

FA vs. RELX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FA vs. RELX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FA

0.01%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

FA’s Dividend Yield of 0.01% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

RELX

1.80%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

RELX’s Dividend Yield of 1.80% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FA

29.87%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

FA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.87% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RELX

60.42%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

RELX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.42% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFARELX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.01%1.80%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.87%60.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FA

--

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

P/E Ratio data for FA is currently unavailable.

RELX

33.61

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

RELX’s P/E Ratio of 33.61 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FA

2.30

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

FA’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RELX

6.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

RELX’s P/S Ratio of 6.79 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FA

2.22

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

FA’s P/B Ratio of 2.22 is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RELX

33.17

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

At 33.17, RELX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FA vs. RELX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Professional Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFARELX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--33.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.306.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.2233.17
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.9328.66