Seek Returns logo

FA vs. GPN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FA and GPN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFAGPN
Company NameFirst Advantage CorporationGlobal Payments Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsFinancials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesFinancial Services
Market Capitalization3.00 billion USD20.98 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 23, 2021January 16, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FA and GPN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FA vs. GPN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFAGPN
5-Day Price Return-1.49%5.41%
13-Week Price Return-5.90%3.99%
26-Week Price Return-9.22%-22.21%
52-Week Price Return0.58%-13.91%
Month-to-Date Return-0.29%8.14%
Year-to-Date Return-7.96%-22.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.04M3.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.13M3.35M
3-Month Volatility43.78%38.30%
Beta1.271.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FA

-13.44%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

FA has a negative Return on Equity of -13.44%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FA

-14.21%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

FA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.21%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FA

-5.21%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

FA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.21%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFAGPN
Return on Equity (TTM)-13.44%6.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)-5.36%2.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.21%15.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5.21%23.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.98%65.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FA

1.96

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

FA’s Current Ratio of 1.96 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FA

1.67

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

FA’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Professional Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.67. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FA

-1.21

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

FA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.21. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFAGPN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.960.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.840.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.670.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-1.215.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

FA vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FA vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FA

0.01%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

FA’s Dividend Yield of 0.01% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GPN

1.18%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.18% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FA

512.33%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

At 512.33%, FA’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Professional Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFAGPN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.01%1.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)512.33%17.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FA

--

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

P/E Ratio data for FA is currently unavailable.

GPN

14.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 14.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FA

2.87

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

FA’s P/S Ratio of 2.87 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GPN

2.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FA

1.91

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

FA’s P/B Ratio of 1.91 is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FA vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFAGPN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--14.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.872.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.910.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.746.69