Seek Returns logo

F vs. VIK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at F and VIK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFVIK
Company NameFord Motor CompanyViking Holdings Ltd
CountryUnited StatesBermuda
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization47.96 billion USD26.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972May 1, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of F and VIK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

F vs. VIK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFVIK
5-Day Price Return5.59%3.24%
13-Week Price Return8.11%16.64%
26-Week Price Return23.94%49.67%
52-Week Price Return16.19%77.85%
Month-to-Date Return2.59%-2.29%
Year-to-Date Return23.94%41.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume71.40M2.50M
3-Month Avg. Volume74.66M2.98M
3-Month Volatility24.58%23.15%
Beta1.611.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

F

7.05%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

F’s Return on Equity of 7.05% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIK

--

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

Return on Equity data for VIK is currently unavailable.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

F

1.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

F’s Net Profit Margin of 1.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIK

14.20%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

VIK’s Net Profit Margin of 14.20% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

F

1.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

F’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.59% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIK

21.61%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

VIK’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.61% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFVIK
Return on Equity (TTM)7.05%--
Return on Assets (TTM)1.10%7.95%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.70%14.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.59%21.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.19%42.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

F

1.10

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

F’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIK

0.64

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

VIK’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

F

3.50

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.50, F operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Automobiles industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VIK

20.33

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 20.33, VIK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

F

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

F’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.73 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

VIK

1.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

VIK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFVIK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.100.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.950.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.5020.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.731.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

F vs. VIK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

F vs. VIK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

F

6.16%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.16%, F offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

F

59.55%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

F’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.55% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFVIK
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.16%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.55%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

F

15.37

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

F’s P/E Ratio of 15.37 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIK

32.52

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

VIK’s P/E Ratio of 32.52 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

F

0.26

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

F’s P/S Ratio of 0.26 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIK

4.62

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

VIK’s P/S Ratio of 4.62 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

F

0.96

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

F’s P/B Ratio of 0.96 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIK

84.85

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

At 84.85, VIK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

F vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFVIK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.3732.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.264.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.9684.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.7818.90