Seek Returns logo

F vs. ROL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at F and ROL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFROL
Company NameFord Motor CompanyRollins, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryAutomobilesCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization45.53 billion USD28.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of F and ROL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

F vs. ROL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFROL
5-Day Price Return1.42%-0.67%
13-Week Price Return8.44%4.29%
26-Week Price Return23.54%15.64%
52-Week Price Return16.02%21.64%
Month-to-Date Return3.34%1.48%
Year-to-Date Return15.56%25.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume68.21M1.41M
3-Month Avg. Volume99.20M1.91M
3-Month Volatility25.54%17.96%
Beta1.560.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

F

7.05%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

F’s Return on Equity of 7.05% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ROL

35.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

ROL’s Return on Equity of 35.93% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

F

1.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

F’s Net Profit Margin of 1.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ROL

13.70%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.70% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

F

1.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

F’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.59% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ROL

19.14%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.14% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFROL
Return on Equity (TTM)7.05%35.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.10%16.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.70%13.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.59%19.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.19%52.69%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

F

1.10

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

F’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROL

0.68

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

ROL’s Current Ratio of 0.68 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

F

3.50

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.50, F operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Automobiles industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ROL

0.38

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

ROL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

F

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

F’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.73 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

ROL

23.77

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

ROL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.77 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFROL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.100.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.950.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.500.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.7323.77

Growth

Revenue Growth

F vs. ROL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

F vs. ROL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

F

6.67%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.67%, F offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ROL

1.11%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Yield of 1.11% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

F

59.55%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

F’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.55% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ROL

63.80%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.80% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFROL
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.67%1.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.55%63.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

F

14.20

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

F’s P/E Ratio of 14.20 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ROL

57.36

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

At 57.36, ROL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

F

0.24

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

F’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ROL

7.86

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 7.86, ROL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

F

0.96

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

F’s P/B Ratio of 0.96 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ROL

18.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 18.94, ROL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

F vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFROL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.2057.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.247.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.9618.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.4244.44