Seek Returns logo

F vs. HAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at F and HAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFHAS
Company NameFord Motor CompanyHasbro, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesLeisure Products
Market Capitalization50.42 billion USD10.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 1, 1972March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of F and HAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

F vs. HAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFHAS
5-Day Price Return4.80%-1.38%
13-Week Price Return7.28%-2.25%
26-Week Price Return26.32%23.42%
52-Week Price Return20.90%4.88%
Month-to-Date Return5.94%0.05%
Year-to-Date Return27.98%35.74%
10-Day Avg. Volume76.26M1.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume74.72M2.03M
3-Month Volatility22.96%20.63%
Beta1.610.56

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

F

7.05%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

F’s Return on Equity of 7.05% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.33%
Q3
18.49%
Median
14.83%
Q1
2.57%
Min
-8.74%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

F

1.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

F’s Net Profit Margin of 1.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
10.59%
Q3
10.12%
Median
7.76%
Q1
1.39%
Min
-4.77%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

F

1.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

F’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.59% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
14.69%
Q3
14.18%
Median
12.19%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-8.06%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFHAS
Return on Equity (TTM)7.05%-58.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.10%-9.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.70%-13.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.59%-8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.19%65.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

F

1.10

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

F’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
3.41
Median
2.38
Q1
1.76
Min
1.04

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

F

3.50

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.50, F operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Automobiles industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
1.10
Median
0.25
Q1
0.07
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

F

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

F’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.73 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
47.39
Q3
30.53
Median
16.20
Q1
5.29
Min
-0.46

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFHAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.951.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.5013.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.735.34

Growth

Revenue Growth

F vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

F vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

F

6.11%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.11%, F offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HAS

3.68%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
3.53%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.68%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

F

59.55%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

F’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.55% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
93.27%
Median
76.96%
Q1
47.15%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFHAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.11%3.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.55%63.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

F

15.51

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

F’s P/E Ratio of 15.51 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.88
Q3
36.36
Median
24.51
Q1
18.86
Min
9.55

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

F

0.26

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

F’s P/S Ratio of 0.26 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HAS

2.50

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
2.49
Median
1.68
Q1
1.11
Min
0.48

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.50 is in the upper echelon for the Leisure Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

F

0.96

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

F’s P/B Ratio of 0.96 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.29
Q3
4.74
Median
3.12
Q1
2.19
Min
1.17

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

F vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFHAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.51--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.262.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.9642.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.8321.26