Seek Returns logo

EXPD vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EXPD and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEXPDPWR
Company NameExpeditors International of Washington, Inc.Quanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAir Freight & LogisticsConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization16.76 billion USD62.76 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 26, 1984February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EXPD and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EXPD vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEXPDPWR
5-Day Price Return0.62%2.95%
13-Week Price Return4.34%8.97%
26-Week Price Return2.72%65.70%
52-Week Price Return-1.73%40.82%
Month-to-Date Return0.76%1.63%
Year-to-Date Return11.51%33.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.05M0.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.22M1.06M
3-Month Volatility21.31%25.03%
Beta1.171.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EXPD

37.65%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.63%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.41%
Min
2.11%

EXPD’s Return on Equity of 37.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EXPD

7.57%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
5.98%
Median
4.11%
Q1
2.45%
Min
0.50%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.57% places EXPD in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EXPD

9.90%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.19%
Median
5.82%
Q1
3.63%
Min
1.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.90% places EXPD in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEXPDPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)37.65%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.52%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.57%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.90%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.19%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EXPD

1.73

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.33
Median
1.15
Q1
0.95
Min
0.61

EXPD’s Current Ratio of 1.73 is in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EXPD

0.00

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.25
Median
0.77
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, EXPD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EXPD

--

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

Interest Coverage Ratio data for EXPD is currently unavailable.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEXPDPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.731.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.731.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--10.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

EXPD vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EXPD vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EXPD

1.22%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.20%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.55%
Min
0.00%

EXPD’s Dividend Yield of 1.22% is consistent with its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR

0.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EXPD

49.01%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
60.17%
Q1
4.60%
Min
0.00%

EXPD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.01% is within the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEXPDPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.22%0.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)49.01%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EXPD

19.84

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
30.08
Q3
23.03
Median
18.40
Q1
12.84
Min
5.90

EXPD’s P/E Ratio of 19.84 is within the middle range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

63.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 63.96, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EXPD

1.50

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.40
Median
0.63
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

EXPD’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 is in the upper echelon for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PWR

2.39

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.39 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EXPD

7.13

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
5.68
Q3
3.23
Median
1.97
Q1
1.31
Min
0.80

At 7.13, EXPD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

PWR’s P/B Ratio of 7.13 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EXPD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEXPDPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.8463.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.502.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.137.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.8845.76