EXE vs. FANG: Expand Energy vs. Diamondback Energy Stock Comparison
How do Expand Energy (EXE) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Expand Energy (EXE) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | EXE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Expand Energy Corp | Diamondback Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 19.54 billion USD | 49.96 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | February 10, 2021 | October 12, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EXE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -22.30% | 26.99% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 4.93% | 8.52% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 9.88% | 14.17% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EXE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.72% | 33.77% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.53 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -30.37% | -42.10% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.10M | 2.38M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EXE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.89 | 0.67 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.27 | 0.97 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 14.62% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EXE
Energy industry group
14.62%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- EXE
- 14.62%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 21.26% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
EXE
Energy industry group
21.26%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- EXE
- 21.26%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Expand Energy (EXE) at 23.18%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
EXE
Energy industry group
23.18%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- EXE
- 23.18%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EXE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 14.62% | 4.86% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.17% | 2.07% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 21.26% | 11.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 23.18% | 44.95% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 45.86% | 73.62% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both companies are growing quickly, but Expand Energy (EXE) at 188.77% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% also sits in the top quartile.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Diamondback Energy (FANG) reports EPS growth of -63.10%, ranked against its industry; Expand Energy (EXE) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EXE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 188.77% | 35.44% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.13% | 15.99% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -63.10% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -39.01% | -38.48% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.90 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.
EXE
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- EXE
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.24 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.
EXE
Energy industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- EXE
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EXE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.90 | 0.55 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.24 | 0.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.68 | 0.99 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Expand Energy (EXE) at 2.70% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
EXE
Energy industry group
2.70%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- EXE
- 2.70%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 19.84% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
EXE
Energy industry group
19.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- EXE
- 19.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EXE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.70% | 2.47% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 19.84% | 57.20% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 7.30 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
EXE
Energy industry group
7.30
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- EXE
- 7.30
- Min
- 2.99
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.51 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
EXE
Energy industry group
1.51
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- EXE
- 1.51
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.00 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued near its industry’s middle — EXE is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
EXE
Energy industry group
1.00
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- EXE
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.01
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EXE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 7.30 | 24.09 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.51 | 2.83 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.00 | 1.28 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.00% | 12.09% |