Seek Returns logo

EXAS vs. PHG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EXAS and PHG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

EXAS is a standard domestic stock, while PHG trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with a way to invest in the foreign-based company.

SymbolEXASPHG
Company NameExact Sciences CorporationKoninklijke Philips N.V.
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryBiotechnologyHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization8.50 billion USD25.94 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateFebruary 1, 2001March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockNY Reg Shrs

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EXAS and PHG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EXAS vs. PHG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEXASPHG
5-Day Price Return4.05%2.43%
13-Week Price Return-15.90%7.53%
26-Week Price Return-17.26%-12.97%
52-Week Price Return-21.91%-12.25%
Month-to-Date Return-4.34%0.17%
Year-to-Date Return-20.07%-5.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.37M1.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.17M1.96M
3-Month Volatility39.24%28.75%
Beta1.211.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EXAS

-38.37%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
77.14%
Q3
10.76%
Median
-20.08%
Q1
-42.71%
Min
-119.20%

EXAS has a negative Return on Equity of -38.37%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PHG

-0.18%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

PHG has a negative Return on Equity of -0.18%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EXAS

-34.19%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
59.44%
Q3
16.21%
Median
-11.49%
Q1
-167.42%
Min
-409.07%

EXAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -34.19%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PHG

0.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Net Profit Margin of 0.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EXAS

-34.49%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.62%
Q3
20.76%
Median
-12.41%
Q1
-181.14%
Min
-482.02%

EXAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -34.49%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PHG

6.11%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

PHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.11% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEXASPHG
Return on Equity (TTM)-38.37%-0.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)-16.63%-0.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-34.19%0.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-34.49%6.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.19%43.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EXAS

2.89

Biotechnology Industry

Max
19.31
Q3
9.38
Median
4.54
Q1
2.45
Min
0.76

EXAS’s Current Ratio of 2.89 aligns with the median group of the Biotechnology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

PHG’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EXAS

0.95

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.64
Median
0.09
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

EXAS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PHG

0.81

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

PHG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

-15.18

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.91
Median
-7.81
Q1
-63.90
Min
-153.80

EXAS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.18. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PHG

1.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEXASPHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.891.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.320.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.950.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.181.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

EXAS vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EXAS vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EXAS

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EXAS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PHG

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Yield of 0.00% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EXAS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PHG

0.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEXASPHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

--

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.14
Q3
38.17
Median
29.01
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for EXAS is currently unavailable.

PHG

137.38

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

At 137.38, PHG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

2.73

Biotechnology Industry

Max
76.98
Q3
36.53
Median
9.49
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry, EXAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PHG

1.24

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s P/S Ratio of 1.24 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EXAS

4.06

Biotechnology Industry

Max
20.53
Q3
9.76
Median
4.77
Q1
2.49
Min
0.59

EXAS’s P/B Ratio of 4.06 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PHG

1.89

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

PHG’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

EXAS vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEXASPHG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--137.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.731.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.061.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)64.1814.38