Seek Returns logo

EXAS vs. GH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EXAS and GH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEXASGH
Company NameExact Sciences CorporationGuardant Health, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryBiotechnologyHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization10.74 billion USD7.84 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 1, 2001October 4, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EXAS and GH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EXAS vs. GH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEXASGH
5-Day Price Return6.26%1.37%
13-Week Price Return6.30%24.44%
26-Week Price Return31.02%47.51%
52-Week Price Return-15.22%181.04%
Month-to-Date Return3.67%0.58%
Year-to-Date Return0.94%105.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.09M2.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.03M2.47M
3-Month Volatility41.17%53.01%
Beta1.441.59

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EXAS

-38.37%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
97.92%
Q3
11.99%
Median
-19.30%
Q1
-51.29%
Min
-132.03%

EXAS has a negative Return on Equity of -38.37%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GH

-246.60%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

GH has a negative Return on Equity of -246.60%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EXAS

-34.19%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
73.34%
Q3
18.98%
Median
-12.96%
Q1
-105.72%
Min
-259.82%

EXAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -34.19%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GH

-49.93%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

GH has a negative Net Profit Margin of -49.93%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EXAS

-34.49%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
78.85%
Q3
21.90%
Median
-13.30%
Q1
-109.94%
Min
-278.10%

EXAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -34.49%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GH

-54.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

GH has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -54.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEXASGH
Return on Equity (TTM)-38.37%-246.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)-16.63%-29.04%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-34.19%-49.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-34.49%-54.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.19%62.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EXAS

2.89

Biotechnology Industry

Max
16.97
Q3
8.39
Median
4.11
Q1
2.64
Min
0.74

EXAS’s Current Ratio of 2.89 aligns with the median group of the Biotechnology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GH

3.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

GH’s Current Ratio of 3.71 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EXAS

0.95

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.79
Median
0.12
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

EXAS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GH

16.78

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 16.78, GH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Providers & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

-15.18

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.03
Median
-9.59
Q1
-65.05
Min
-163.11

EXAS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.18. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GH

-150.95

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

GH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -150.95. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEXASGH
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.893.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.323.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.9516.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.18-150.95

Growth

Revenue Growth

EXAS vs. GH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EXAS vs. GH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EXAS

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EXAS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EXAS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEXASGH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

--

Biotechnology Industry

Max
40.44
Q3
39.37
Median
22.12
Q1
15.76
Min
3.48

P/E Ratio data for EXAS is currently unavailable.

GH

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

P/E Ratio data for GH is currently unavailable.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

3.63

Biotechnology Industry

Max
92.67
Q3
41.36
Median
8.45
Q1
4.46
Min
0.97

In the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry, EXAS’s P/S Ratio of 3.63 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GH

9.50

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 9.50, GH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EXAS

4.06

Biotechnology Industry

Max
22.72
Q3
10.68
Median
4.55
Q1
2.44
Min
0.59

EXAS’s P/B Ratio of 4.06 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GH

35.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

At 35.72, GH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EXAS vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEXASGH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.639.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.0635.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)85.30--