Seek Returns logo

EXAS vs. FMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EXAS and FMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

EXAS is a standard domestic listing, while FMS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolEXASFMS
Company NameExact Sciences CorporationFresenius Medical Care AG
CountryUnited StatesGermany
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryBiotechnologyHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization10.74 billion USD15.74 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateFebruary 1, 2001September 17, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EXAS and FMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EXAS vs. FMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEXASFMS
5-Day Price Return6.26%4.17%
13-Week Price Return6.30%-4.77%
26-Week Price Return31.02%-0.85%
52-Week Price Return-15.22%20.38%
Month-to-Date Return3.67%1.86%
Year-to-Date Return0.94%3.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.09M0.57M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.03M0.54M
3-Month Volatility41.17%21.87%
Beta1.440.59

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EXAS

-38.37%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
97.92%
Q3
11.99%
Median
-19.30%
Q1
-51.29%
Min
-132.03%

EXAS has a negative Return on Equity of -38.37%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FMS

4.70%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EXAS

-34.19%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
73.34%
Q3
18.98%
Median
-12.96%
Q1
-105.72%
Min
-259.82%

EXAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -34.19%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FMS

3.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EXAS

-34.49%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
78.85%
Q3
21.90%
Median
-13.30%
Q1
-109.94%
Min
-278.10%

EXAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -34.49%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FMS

7.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEXASFMS
Return on Equity (TTM)-38.37%4.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)-16.63%2.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-34.19%3.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-34.49%7.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.19%24.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EXAS

2.89

Biotechnology Industry

Max
16.97
Q3
8.39
Median
4.11
Q1
2.64
Min
0.74

EXAS’s Current Ratio of 2.89 aligns with the median group of the Biotechnology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FMS

1.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EXAS

0.95

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.79
Median
0.12
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

EXAS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FMS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

-15.18

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.03
Median
-9.59
Q1
-65.05
Min
-163.11

EXAS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.18. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FMS

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEXASFMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.891.44
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.321.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.950.83
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.185.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

EXAS vs. FMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EXAS vs. FMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EXAS

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EXAS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FMS

3.20%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.20%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EXAS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FMS

187.56%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 187.56%, FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEXASFMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%187.56%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

--

Biotechnology Industry

Max
40.44
Q3
39.37
Median
22.12
Q1
15.76
Min
3.48

P/E Ratio data for EXAS is currently unavailable.

FMS

20.14

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 20.14 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EXAS

3.63

Biotechnology Industry

Max
92.67
Q3
41.36
Median
8.45
Q1
4.46
Min
0.97

In the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry, EXAS’s P/S Ratio of 3.63 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FMS

0.68

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EXAS

4.06

Biotechnology Industry

Max
22.72
Q3
10.68
Median
4.55
Q1
2.44
Min
0.59

EXAS’s P/B Ratio of 4.06 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FMS

1.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

EXAS vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEXASFMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--20.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.630.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.061.07
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)85.306.56