Seek Returns logo

EW vs. ILMN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EW and ILMN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEWILMN
Company NameEdwards Lifesciences CorporationIllumina, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization47.50 billion USD15.76 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 27, 2000July 28, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EW and ILMN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EW vs. ILMN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEWILMN
5-Day Price Return-0.32%0.25%
13-Week Price Return6.14%20.67%
26-Week Price Return10.37%5.67%
52-Week Price Return17.67%-23.68%
Month-to-Date Return2.00%-3.09%
Year-to-Date Return9.28%-25.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.25M1.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.40M2.12M
3-Month Volatility20.44%36.56%
Beta1.051.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EW

41.25%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

EW’s Return on Equity of 41.25% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ILMN

55.15%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

ILMN’s Return on Equity of 55.15% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EW

72.96%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

EW’s Net Profit Margin of 72.96% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ILMN

29.37%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

ILMN’s Net Profit Margin of 29.37% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EW

25.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.01% places EW in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ILMN

30.21%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.21% places ILMN in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEWILMN
Return on Equity (TTM)41.25%55.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)31.58%20.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)72.96%29.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.01%30.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.87%66.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EW

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

EW’s Current Ratio of 4.68 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ILMN

1.81

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

ILMN’s Current Ratio of 1.81 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EW

0.06

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, EW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ILMN

0.88

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

ILMN’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EW

3.15

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, EW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.15 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ILMN

-2.28

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

ILMN has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.28. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEWILMN
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.681.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.791.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.060.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.15-2.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

EW vs. ILMN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EW vs. ILMN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EW

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ILMN

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ILMN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EW

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ILMN

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ILMN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEWILMN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EW

11.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

EW’s P/E Ratio of 11.41 is below the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

ILMN

12.31

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

In the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, ILMN’s P/E Ratio of 12.31 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EW

8.33

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

EW’s P/S Ratio of 8.33 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ILMN

3.61

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

ILMN’s P/S Ratio of 3.61 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EW

4.35

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

EW’s P/B Ratio of 4.35 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ILMN

6.69

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

ILMN’s P/B Ratio of 6.69 is in the upper tier for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EW vs. ILMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEWILMN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.4112.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.333.61
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.356.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)62.3015.02