Seek Returns logo

EW vs. GILD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EW and GILD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEWGILD
Company NameEdwards Lifesciences CorporationGilead Sciences, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesBiotechnology
Market Capitalization48.04 billion USD142.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 27, 2000January 22, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EW and GILD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EW vs. GILD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEWGILD
5-Day Price Return4.51%-2.73%
13-Week Price Return7.53%6.54%
26-Week Price Return8.14%9.05%
52-Week Price Return16.75%52.76%
Month-to-Date Return3.18%2.21%
Year-to-Date Return10.54%24.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.02M6.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.39M7.72M
3-Month Volatility21.07%29.32%
Beta1.050.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EW

41.25%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

EW’s Return on Equity of 41.25% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GILD

32.97%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
77.14%
Q3
10.76%
Median
-20.08%
Q1
-42.71%
Min
-119.20%

In the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, GILD’s Return on Equity of 32.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EW

72.96%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

EW’s Net Profit Margin of 72.96% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GILD

21.87%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
59.44%
Q3
16.21%
Median
-11.49%
Q1
-167.42%
Min
-409.07%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.87% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EW

25.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.01% places EW in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GILD

27.89%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.62%
Q3
20.76%
Median
-12.41%
Q1
-181.14%
Min
-482.02%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.89% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEWGILD
Return on Equity (TTM)41.25%32.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)31.58%11.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)72.96%21.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.01%27.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.87%78.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EW

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

EW’s Current Ratio of 4.68 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GILD

1.32

Biotechnology Industry

Max
19.31
Q3
9.38
Median
4.54
Q1
2.45
Min
0.76

GILD’s Current Ratio of 1.32 falls into the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EW

0.06

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, EW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GILD

1.27

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.64
Median
0.09
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

GILD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EW

3.15

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, EW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.15 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GILD

1.71

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.91
Median
-7.81
Q1
-63.90
Min
-153.80

GILD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Biotechnology industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEWGILD
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.681.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.790.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.061.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.151.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

EW vs. GILD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EW vs. GILD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EW

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GILD

3.98%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GILD’s Dividend Yield of 3.98% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EW

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GILD

117.08%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 117.08%, GILD’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEWGILD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.98%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%117.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EW

11.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

EW’s P/E Ratio of 11.41 is below the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

GILD

23.57

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.14
Q3
38.17
Median
29.01
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

GILD’s P/E Ratio of 23.57 is within the middle range for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EW

8.33

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

EW’s P/S Ratio of 8.33 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GILD

5.15

Biotechnology Industry

Max
76.98
Q3
36.53
Median
9.49
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

GILD’s P/S Ratio of 5.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EW

4.35

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

EW’s P/B Ratio of 4.35 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GILD

7.01

Biotechnology Industry

Max
20.53
Q3
9.76
Median
4.77
Q1
2.49
Min
0.59

GILD’s P/B Ratio of 7.01 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EW vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEWGILD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.4123.57
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.335.15
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.357.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)62.3016.29