Seek Returns logo

EW vs. GH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EW and GH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEWGH
Company NameEdwards Lifesciences CorporationGuardant Health, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization44.80 billion USD7.81 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 27, 2000October 4, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EW and GH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EW vs. GH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEWGH
5-Day Price Return4.17%8.34%
13-Week Price Return-0.56%20.06%
26-Week Price Return9.40%36.30%
52-Week Price Return16.81%173.08%
Month-to-Date Return-4.39%-7.33%
Year-to-Date Return5.05%104.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.34M2.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.28M2.46M
3-Month Volatility20.02%53.22%
Beta1.021.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EW

41.25%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

EW’s Return on Equity of 41.25% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GH

-246.60%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

GH has a negative Return on Equity of -246.60%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EW

72.96%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

EW’s Net Profit Margin of 72.96% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GH

-49.93%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

GH has a negative Net Profit Margin of -49.93%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EW

25.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.01% places EW in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GH

-54.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

GH has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -54.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEWGH
Return on Equity (TTM)41.25%-246.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)31.58%-29.04%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)72.96%-49.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.01%-54.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.87%62.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EW

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

EW’s Current Ratio of 4.68 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GH

3.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

GH’s Current Ratio of 3.71 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EW

0.06

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, EW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GH

16.78

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 16.78, GH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Providers & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EW

3.15

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, EW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.15 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GH

-150.95

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

GH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -150.95. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEWGH
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.683.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.793.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.0616.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.15-150.95

Growth

Revenue Growth

EW vs. GH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EW vs. GH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EW

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EW

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEWGH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EW

10.61

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

EW’s P/E Ratio of 10.61 is below the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

GH

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

P/E Ratio data for GH is currently unavailable.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EW

7.74

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

EW’s P/S Ratio of 7.74 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GH

9.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 9.44, GH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EW

4.35

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

EW’s P/B Ratio of 4.35 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GH

35.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

At 35.72, GH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EW vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEWGH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.61--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.749.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.3535.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)57.92--