Seek Returns logo

ETSY vs. FLUT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ETSY and FLUT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolETSYFLUT
Company NameEtsy, Inc.Flutter Entertainment plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization6.95 billion USD51.64 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateApril 16, 2015October 4, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ETSY and FLUT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ETSY vs. FLUT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolETSYFLUT
5-Day Price Return15.87%-4.04%
13-Week Price Return47.28%18.80%
26-Week Price Return26.38%10.37%
52-Week Price Return31.77%55.99%
Month-to-Date Return20.28%-2.83%
Year-to-Date Return32.52%13.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.78M2.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.58M2.55M
3-Month Volatility48.56%32.59%
Beta1.861.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ETSY

67.87%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

ETSY’s Return on Equity of 67.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FLUT

5.32%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 5.32% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ETSY

5.78%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

ETSY’s Net Profit Margin of 5.78% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLUT

3.65%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 3.65% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ETSY

10.25%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

ETSY’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.25% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLUT

6.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.71% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolETSYFLUT
Return on Equity (TTM)67.87%5.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.88%2.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.78%3.65%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.25%6.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)72.20%47.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ETSY

3.39

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

ETSY’s Current Ratio of 3.39 is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ETSY

4.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.11, ETSY operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Broadline Retail industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FLUT

0.69

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ETSY

-193.71

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

ETSY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -193.71. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolETSYFLUT
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.390.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.210.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)4.110.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-193.711.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

ETSY vs. FLUT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ETSY vs. FLUT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ETSY

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ETSY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ETSY

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ETSY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolETSYFLUT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ETSY

41.67

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

A P/E Ratio of 41.67 places ETSY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FLUT

99.19

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

At 99.19, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ETSY

2.41

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

ETSY’s P/S Ratio of 2.41 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLUT

3.62

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ETSY

16.01

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

At 16.01, ETSY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Broadline Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLUT

3.98

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 3.98 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ETSY vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolETSYFLUT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.6799.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.413.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)16.013.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.7761.35