Seek Returns logo

ETN vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ETN and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolETNUBER
Company NameEaton Corporation plcUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization145.39 billion USD201.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ETN and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ETN vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolETNUBER
5-Day Price Return1.72%-2.98%
13-Week Price Return3.10%3.17%
26-Week Price Return37.39%32.58%
52-Week Price Return13.86%32.56%
Month-to-Date Return-0.21%-1.40%
Year-to-Date Return12.53%60.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.91M15.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.26M18.92M
3-Month Volatility26.33%27.87%
Beta1.181.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ETN

21.03%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

ETN’s Return on Equity of 21.03% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ETN

15.56%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.56% places ETN in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ETN

19.27%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.27% places ETN in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolETNUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)21.03%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.99%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.56%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.27%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.45%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ETN

1.24

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

ETN’s Current Ratio of 1.24 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ETN

0.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

ETN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ETN

36.12

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

ETN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.12 is in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolETNUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.241.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.590.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.12-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

ETN vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ETN vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ETN

1.07%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ETN’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ETN

39.77%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ETN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.77% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolETNUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.07%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.77%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ETN

37.14

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

ETN’s P/E Ratio of 37.14 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

15.98

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.98 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ETN

5.76

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ETN’s P/S Ratio of 5.76 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.26

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.26, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ETN

7.51

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

ETN’s P/B Ratio of 7.51 is in the upper tier for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ETN vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolETNUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.1415.98
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.764.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.518.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.5823.63