Seek Returns logo

ETN vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ETN and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolETNPWR
Company NameEaton Corporation plcQuanta Services, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization134.78 billion USD56.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ETN and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ETN vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolETNPWR
5-Day Price Return-2.50%-0.43%
13-Week Price Return5.14%9.04%
26-Week Price Return12.48%29.23%
52-Week Price Return16.55%40.20%
Month-to-Date Return-10.01%-7.45%
Year-to-Date Return4.32%18.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.26M1.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.42M1.19M
3-Month Volatility26.60%22.91%
Beta1.201.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ETN

21.03%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, ETN’s Return on Equity of 21.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ETN

15.56%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.56% places ETN in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ETN

19.27%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.27% places ETN in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolETNPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)21.03%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.99%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.56%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.27%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.45%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ETN

1.24

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

ETN’s Current Ratio of 1.24 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ETN

0.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

ETN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ETN

36.12

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

ETN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.12 is in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolETNPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.241.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.590.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.1210.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

ETN vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ETN vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ETN

1.16%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ETN’s Dividend Yield of 1.16% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ETN

39.77%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ETN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.77% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolETNPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.16%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.77%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ETN

34.15

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

ETN’s P/E Ratio of 34.15 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ETN

5.30

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

ETN’s P/S Ratio of 5.30 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ETN

7.51

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

ETN’s P/B Ratio of 7.51 is in the upper tier for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ETN vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolETNPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.1557.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.302.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.517.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.9840.85