Seek Returns logo

ESS vs. IRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ESS and IRM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both ESS and IRM are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolESSIRM
Company NameEssex Property Trust, Inc.Iron Mountain Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryResidential REITsSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization17.87 billion USD27.75 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 7, 1994February 1, 1996
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ESS and IRM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ESS vs. IRM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolESSIRM
5-Day Price Return0.67%2.33%
13-Week Price Return-9.63%-4.05%
26-Week Price Return-13.20%-11.52%
52-Week Price Return-8.12%-13.53%
Month-to-Date Return-0.56%-3.48%
Year-to-Date Return-9.36%-10.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.66M2.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.51M1.65M
3-Month Volatility25.66%23.87%
Beta0.841.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ESS

14.44%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.21%
Q3
9.45%
Median
7.42%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.37%

ESS’s Return on Equity of 14.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

IRM

85.19%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

IRM’s Return on Equity of 85.19% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ESS

43.51%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
67.49%
Q3
38.86%
Median
25.74%
Q1
7.62%
Min
0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

IRM

0.64%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ESS

52.69%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.06%
Q3
45.82%
Median
29.89%
Q1
19.34%
Min
5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

IRM

16.17%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolESSIRM
Return on Equity (TTM)14.44%85.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.16%0.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)43.51%0.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)52.69%16.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.55%66.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ESS

0.71

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.28
Q3
0.64
Median
0.21
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

ESS’s Current Ratio of 0.71 is in the upper quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IRM

0.63

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

IRM’s Current Ratio of 0.63 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ESS

1.20

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.69
Min
0.28

ESS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Residential REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

IRM

685.59

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 685.59, IRM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ESS

8.86

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.86, ESS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

IRM

1.36

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.36 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolESSIRM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.710.63
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.170.54
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.20685.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.861.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

ESS vs. IRM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ESS vs. IRM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ESS

3.90%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.21%
Q3
3.83%
Median
3.40%
Q1
3.27%
Min
2.80%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.90%, ESS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Residential REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IRM

3.15%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

IRM’s Dividend Yield of 3.15% is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ESS

79.64%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
210.87%
Q3
145.45%
Median
102.94%
Q1
84.58%
Min
17.15%

ESS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.64% is in the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

IRM

400.99%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

At 400.99%, IRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolESSIRM
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.90%3.15%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)79.64%400.99%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ESS

20.44

Residential REITs Industry

Max
177.01
Q3
109.22
Median
31.26
Q1
25.84
Min
8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

IRM

658.31

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ESS

8.89

Residential REITs Industry

Max
12.50
Q3
10.33
Median
8.01
Q1
6.55
Min
5.06

ESS’s P/S Ratio of 8.89 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IRM

4.22

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s P/S Ratio of 4.22 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ESS

3.24

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.83
Median
2.20
Q1
1.42
Min
0.67

ESS’s P/B Ratio of 3.24 is in the upper tier for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IRM

1,254.25

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

At 1,254.25, IRM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ESS vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolESSIRM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.44658.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.894.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.241,254.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)70.96387.86