Seek Returns logo

ERJ vs. PH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ERJ and PH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ERJ trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, PH is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolERJPH
Company NameEmbraer S.A.Parker-Hannifin Corporation
CountryBrazilUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseMachinery
Market Capitalization10.77 billion USD97.37 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 21, 2000March 17, 1980
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ERJ and PH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ERJ vs. PH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolERJPH
5-Day Price Return1.76%5.06%
13-Week Price Return14.32%13.95%
26-Week Price Return37.92%10.19%
52-Week Price Return88.96%34.22%
Month-to-Date Return-1.75%4.12%
Year-to-Date Return41.04%19.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.97M0.90M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.03M0.73M
3-Month Volatility43.48%20.84%
Beta0.171.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ERJ

11.78%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

ERJ’s Return on Equity of 11.78% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PH

26.61%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

In the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, PH’s Return on Equity of 26.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ERJ

5.37%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

ERJ’s Net Profit Margin of 5.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PH

17.79%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.79% places PH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ERJ

11.14%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.14% places ERJ in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PH

20.41%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.41% places PH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolERJPH
Return on Equity (TTM)11.78%26.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.17%12.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.37%17.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.14%20.41%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)18.48%36.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ERJ

1.33

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

ERJ’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PH

1.19

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

PH’s Current Ratio of 1.19 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ERJ

0.70

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

ERJ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PH

0.68

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

PH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ERJ

36.57

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

ERJ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.57 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PH

11.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

PH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolERJPH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.331.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.590.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.700.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.5711.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

ERJ vs. PH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ERJ vs. PH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ERJ

0.09%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERJ’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PH

0.89%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

PH’s Dividend Yield of 0.89% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ERJ

11.51%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERJ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.51% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PH

24.39%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

PH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.39% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolERJPH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.09%0.89%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)11.51%24.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ERJ

27.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

ERJ’s P/E Ratio of 27.23 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PH

27.27

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

PH’s P/E Ratio of 27.27 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ERJ

1.46

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

ERJ’s P/S Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PH

4.85

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

PH’s P/S Ratio of 4.85 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ERJ

3.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

ERJ’s P/B Ratio of 3.13 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PH

6.52

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

PH’s P/B Ratio of 6.52 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ERJ vs. PH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolERJPH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.2327.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.464.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.136.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.9428.82