Seek Returns logo

ERIC vs. LDOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ERIC and LDOS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ERIC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, LDOS is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolERICLDOS
Company NameTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)Leidos Holdings, Inc.
CountrySwedenUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentProfessional Services
Market Capitalization26.75 billion USD24.59 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 24, 1981October 17, 2006
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ERIC and LDOS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ERIC vs. LDOS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolERICLDOS
5-Day Price Return0.70%0.83%
13-Week Price Return-4.75%19.78%
26-Week Price Return-6.96%38.59%
52-Week Price Return-1.09%18.31%
Month-to-Date Return3.37%4.44%
Year-to-Date Return-13.40%31.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.14M1.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.55M0.99M
3-Month Volatility26.42%21.70%
Beta0.780.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ERIC

19.57%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

ERIC’s Return on Equity of 19.57% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LDOS

31.25%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

LDOS’s Return on Equity of 31.25% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ERIC

7.04%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

ERIC’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LDOS

8.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

LDOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ERIC

10.60%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

ERIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.60% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LDOS

11.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

LDOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.95% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolERICLDOS
Return on Equity (TTM)19.57%31.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.22%10.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.04%8.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.60%11.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)47.18%17.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ERIC

1.09

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

ERIC’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LDOS

1.62

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

LDOS’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ERIC

0.50

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

ERIC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LDOS

1.09

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

LDOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.09 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ERIC

3.82

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

ERIC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LDOS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

LDOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolERICLDOS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.091.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.861.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.501.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.8211.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

ERIC vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ERIC vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ERIC

3.57%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.57%, ERIC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LDOS

0.87%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ERIC

70.91%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.91% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LDOS

14.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.91% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolERICLDOS
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.57%0.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)70.91%14.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ERIC

15.10

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ERIC’s P/E Ratio of 15.10 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LDOS

17.21

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s P/E Ratio of 17.21 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ERIC

1.06

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

ERIC’s P/S Ratio of 1.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LDOS

1.42

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

LDOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ERIC

3.15

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

ERIC’s P/B Ratio of 3.15 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LDOS

4.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

LDOS’s P/B Ratio of 4.54 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ERIC vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolERICLDOS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.1017.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.061.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.154.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.7318.02